Karnataka High Court
WP/957/2024 of MRS YALLAMMA Vs M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD on 7 October 2026
2026:KHC:55911
CNR: KAHC010015382024 NC: 2026:KHC:55911 WP No. 957 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.957 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: MRS. YALLAMMA W/O MR. RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010015382024
NC: 2026:KHC:55911
WP No. 957 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION NO.957 OF 2024 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
MRS. YALLAMMA
W/O MR. RAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R/AT NO.46, 4TH B CROSS,
KUVEMPU LAYOUT,
NEAR VENKATESWARA MAHILA SOCIETY,
DEVASANDRA VILLAGE, KRISHNA RAJPUR,
HOBLI, BENGALURU – 560036
PAN NO. AHPPY8049R.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. KAVITHA D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.,
(INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES
ACT, 1956 (NO.1 OF 1956)
REGISTERED OFFICE AT 27 BKC, C 27,
G BLOCK, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX,
BANDRA (E), MUMBAI – 400051.
IFSC CODE: KKBK0001368
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED OFFICER.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. FRANCIS XAVIER, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
SECTION 14 ORDER OBTAINED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK
DATED 13.12.2023 PASSED BY XACMM AT BENGALURU IN
Digitally signed by
MAHALAKSHMI B M
Location: High Court
of Karnataka
Page 1 of 2
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010015382024
NC: 2026:KHC:55911
WP No. 957 of 2024
CRL.MIS.50171/2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-K BY STATING THAT THE
ENTIRE
RECOVERY
PROCEEDINGS
INITIATED
BY
THE
RESPONDENT BANK AGAINST THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY ARE
ILLEGAL AND IN VIOLATION OF SARFAESI ACT, 2002 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN
‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has settled the entire loan amount, pursuant to which, the loan account has been closed and the writ petition would not survive for consideration.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent has filed a memo to the said effect that the petitioner has settled the loan account and that the respondent has issued a No Due Certificate.
3. Memo is taken on record.
4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA AT, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…