Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/3880/2019 of SRI T R HARIPRASAD Vs SMT H R PRAKRUTHI @ PADMAVATHI on 7 October 2026
2026:KHC:55889
CNR: KAHC010154502019 NC: 2026:KHC:55889 CRL.P No. 3880 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3880 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T.R. HARIPRASAD, S/O T.A. RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010154502019
NC: 2026:KHC:55889
CRL.P No. 3880 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3880 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. T.R. HARIPRASAD,
S/O T.A. RAMAKRISHNA,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
R/AT C/O HANUMANTHAPPA,
NO.44, 1ST CROSS,
NEAR SRI GANAPATHI TEMPLE,
BHADRAPPA LAYOUT,
NAGASHETTIHALLI,
BENGALURU-64.
…PETITIONER
(SRI. T.R.HARIPRASAD, PETITIONER - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
SMT. H.R. PRAKRUTHI @ PADMAVATHI,
W/O T.R. HARIPRASAD,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS.
2.
MISS. PARINITHA
AGED ABOUT 2 YEARS,
D/O T.R. HARIPRASAD,
SINCE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER
AND NATURAL GUARDIAN RESPONDENT NO.1.
BOTH R/AT 1258,
"SRINIDHI NILAYA",
OPP: SRI RAGHAVENDRA SWAMY TEMPLE,
NORTH EXTENSION, HASSAN-573201.
…RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
Page 1 of 2
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010154502019
NC: 2026:KHC:55889
CRL.P No. 3880 of 2019
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT AND
PROCEEDINGS IN C.MISC.NO.475/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST
CLASS AT HASSAN.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
This petition was filed in 2019. The petitioner is not pursuing the matter even after the death of the learned counsel for the petitioner. This Court had issued notice to the petitioner and notice was returned within an endorsement that the petitioner has vacated the address mentioned in the petition. Even after lapse of seven years also, the petitioner has neither taken any steps to pursue the matter nor complied with the office objections raised at the scrutiny stage. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…