Karnataka High Court
WP/47860/2019 of SMT. GENEVIEVE T. MASCARENHAS Vs SRI HUGH G BRITO on 7 October 2026
2025:KHC:21170
NC: 2025:KHC:21170 WP No. 47860 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A . PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 47860 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. GENEVIEVE T. MASCARENHAS W/O. SRI. HUGH MASCARENHAS, HOUSEWIFE,
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC:21170
WP No. 47860 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
WRIT PETITION NO. 47860 OF 2019 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. GENEVIEVE T. MASCARENHAS
W/O. SRI. HUGH MASCARENHAS,
HOUSEWIFE, AGED 64 YEARS
RESIDING AT 25, LANE NO.2,
UDAYNAGAR, OFF. GANGAPUR ROAD,
NASHIK 422013, MAHARASHTRA.
EXECUTRIX AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF
SRI. ANTHONY I BRITO (DECEASED)
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. ROSA PARAMEL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. HUGH G. BRITO
BUSINESSMAN,
AGED 67 YEARS
2.
SRI. RALPH S. BRITO
BUSINESS EXECUTIVE,
AGED 56 YEARS
BOTH PERMANENTLY OF
4 LANGFORD ROAD,
BENGALURU-560025.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.B. RAJU, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1)
THIS
WP
IS
FILED
UNDER
ARTICLE
OF
THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OR SET ASIDE THE
ANNEXURE-C ORDER DATED 18.11.2014 DISMISSING THEIR P AND
SC NO.25031/2009 PETITION FOR THE GRANT OF LETTERS OF
Digitally
signed by
SUMA
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
Page 1 of 2
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC:21170
WP No. 47860 of 2019
ADMINISTRATION PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE IV ADDL.CITY
CIVIL JUDGE, COURT HALL NO.21, MAYO HALL, BENGALURU, AND IN
REVERSAL THEREOF TO ALLOW THE SAID PETITION AS PRAYED FOR
THEREIN VIZ BY GRANTING THEM LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION AS
THEREIN SOUGHT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
ORAL ORDER
This Court on 10.01.2025 passed the following:
ORDER
"Finally, two weeks time is granted to do the needful.
By that time, if the needful is not done, the writ petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court."
2. In view of the aforesaid order, this Court has no other option than to dismiss the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…