Karnataka High Court

CRL.A/1815/2016 of SMT. LAKSHMAMMA K. V. Vs T. K. LAKSHMINARASIMHAMURTHY on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010500602016 NC: 2026:KHC:55573 CRL.A No. 1815 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1815 OF 2016 ( A ) BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMAMMA K. V. W/O. K. RAMACHANDRA, AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1815 OF 2016 (A)

BETWEEN:

SMT. LAKSHMAMMA K. V.

W/O. K. RAMACHANDRA,

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

RESIDENT OF THAVAREKERE,

THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI,

NELAMANGALA TALUK,

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. K HANUMANTHARAYAPPA.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

T. K. LAKSHMINARASIMHAMURTHY,

S/O. LATE KAMBAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

2.

T. L. VISHWANATHA,

S/O. T.K. LAKSHMINARASIMHAMURTHY,

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,

3.

SHAKUNTHALA,

W/O. T.K. LAKSHMINARASIMHAMURTHY,

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,

ALL ARE R/AT THAVAREKERE,

THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI,

NELAMANGALA TALUK,

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. GIRIGOWDA C., ADVOCATE)

Digitally

signed by

REKHA R

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

THIS CRL.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) CR.P.C

PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET

ASIDE

THE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

AND

ORDER

DATED:17.08.2016 PASSED BY THE PRL. C.J. AND J.M.F.C., NELAMANGALA IN C.C.NO.399/2010 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 504,323,324 AND 506(B) R/W 34 OF IPC AND ETC.,

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

ORAL JUDGMENT

Appellant's counsel present.

2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 17.08.2016 passed by the Prl.Civil Judge and JMFC, Nelamangala in C.C.No.399/2010.

3. The trial Court has acquitted the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 504, 323, 324 and 506(B)

HC-KAR

r/w Section 34 of IPC. The offence punishable under Section 324 IPC is cognizable and non-bailable.

4. Hence, in view of Section 378(1)(a) of Cr.P.C, the appeal against the order of acquittal passed by the Magistrate in respect of cognizable and non-bailable lies to the Court of Sessions. Hence, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

(i) Appeal is disposed of.

(ii) Registry is directed to return the memorandum of appeal along with necessary papers to the appellant to present the same before the jurisdictional Sessions Court.

(iii) The appellant can avail the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act.

Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE

RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead