Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/13949/2026 of SRI SHARIFF A Vs STATE BY KARNATAKA on 6 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010620662026 NC: 2026:KHC:55741 CRL.P No. 13949 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13949 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI. SHARIFF A SON OF ABDUL REHAMAN AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13949 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SRI. SHARIFF A
SON OF ABDUL REHAMAN
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF SYED THOPI HOUSE,
NARENDRA SOCIETY ROAD,
OPPOSITE TO GANESH TEMPLE,
AMBEDKAR NAGAR, VIJINAPURA,
RAMAMURTHY NAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 016.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NATARAJ D, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BY KARNATAKA
RAMA MURTHY NAGAR POLICE STATION,
BANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
OFF/AT HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAHUL RAI K, HCGP)
Digitally signed
by NANDINI M
S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 483
BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON REGULAR
BAIL UNDER SEC.483 OF THE CODE OF BNSS 2023 IN
S.C.NO.1137/2026
(CR.NO.234/2026)
OF
RAMAMURTHY
NAGAR P.S. BENGALURU CITY NOW PENDING BEFORE THE
HONBLE XIII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MAYO
HALL BENGALURU CCH-22 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S
103(1) OF BNS 2023.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for some time submits that, CW-1, who is the wife of the petitioner, is the sole eye-witness to the incident in question and this petition may be dismissed as not pressed at this stage, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh bail application before the Trial Court after CW-1 is examined.
2. The said submission is placed on record.
HC-KAR
3. This criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4. It is needless to state that the Trial Court as well as the prosecution shall make all endeavours to examine CW-1 before the Trial Court as expeditiously as possible on priority.
Pending applications, if any, do not survive for consideration.
Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE
SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69