Karnataka High Court
RPFC/290/2024 of KARTHIK V.P Vs ANJALI KASHYAP on 6 October 2026
2026:KHC:55729
CNR: KAHC010752512024 NC: 2026:KHC:55729 RPFC No. 290 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 290 OF 2024 BETWEEN: KARTHIK V.P S/O V.N.PRABHAKAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 290 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
KARTHIK V.P
S/O V.N.PRABHAKAR
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
PRESENTLY WORKING AT UNIT 1/19
MERITION STREET, GLADESVILLE
NSW 2111
AUSTRALIA
ALSO RESIDING AT NO.390,
38TH CROSS, 9TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU – 560 009
GPA HOLDER
SRI. PRABHAKAR.V.N.
S/O LATE B. NAGESH RAO,
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS,
R/AT NO.390, 38TH CROSS,
9TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU – 560 009
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRABHAKAR L. SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
ANJALI KASHYAP
EX -WIFE OF KARTHIK PRABHAKAR
R/O NO 187, 14 A CROSS
VYALIKAVAL
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
Page 1 of 3
BENGALURU -560 003
2.
ANVITRAYEE
D/O KARTHIK PRABHAKAR
AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS
MINOR REP. BY HER NATURAL
GURARDIAN AND MOTHER
ANJALI KASHYAP
BOTH ARE R/O NO.287
14 A CROSS, VYALIKAVAL
BENGALURU -560 003
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KASHYAP N. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY
COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.08.2022
PASSED IN CRL. MISC NO.669/2019 ON THE FILE OF I
ADDITIONAL
PRL
JUDGE,
FAMILY
COURT,
BENGALURU,
ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF Cr.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
Memo is filed by the petitioner to withdraw the RPFC with liberty to proceed with O.S.No.198/2026 for recognition of the order dated 19.01.2026 passed by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
2. Memo is taken on record.
HC-KAR
Page 2 of 3
3. The petitioner is before this Court questioning the order passed in Crl.Misc.No.669/2019. If the petitioner wants to avail any remedy before the civil court, no liberty is required; it is for the petitioner to pursue the remedy in accordance with law.
4. In that view of the matter, RPFC is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Pending IAs., if any in this petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46 *AK
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…