Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/2169/2023 of DR S MAHALINGAM Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY on 6 October 2026

2026:KHC:55748

CNR: KAHC010070792023 NC: 2026:KHC:55748 CRL.P No. 2169 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2169 OF 2023 BETWEEN: DR. S, MAHALINGAM S/O LATE SRI V. SHANMUGAM AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2169 OF 2023

BETWEEN:

DR. S, MAHALINGAM

S/O LATE SRI V. SHANMUGAM

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

FOUNDER CHAIRMAN

FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION FOR ALL

BANGALORE, A REGISTERED PUBLIC TRUST

HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.F-4

ASHRAYA RESIDENCY, BTM LAYOUT

IST STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 068.

…PETITIONER

(PETITIONER - ABSENT)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

JAYAPRAKASH NAGAR

POLICE STATION

BENGALURU CITY

BENGALURU - 560 078

REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

BANGALORE - 560 001.

2.

SRI R. KISHORE

S/O REVEENDRAN

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

SECRETARY, GNANA VRIKSH INSTITUTIONS

HAVING OFFICE AT NO.30/1

4TH MAIN, BTM DRC POST

BENGALURU - 560 029.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI RAHUL RAI K, HCGP FOR R-1;

SRI SHREYAS N, ADV., FOR R-2)

Digitally signed

by NANDINI M

S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

Page 1 of 3

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE

THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21.07.2022 PASSED IN CRIME

NO.148/2018 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 448, 341, 323, 324, 504, 506(b) OF IPC PASSED BY THE LEARNED 30TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU AS PER ANNEXURE K

AND THEREBY TO SET ASIDE THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE B REPORT

SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT POLICE AS PER ANNEXURE H.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

ORAL ORDER

1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On 11.09.2026, this Court had passed the following order:-

"Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking to retire from the case.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that files relating to the case have been handed over to the petitioner and his signature is also obtained in the memo of retirement, which is now filed.

The submission is placed on record. Memo of retirement which is dated 22.12.2025 bears the signature of the petitioner. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to retire from the case.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

HC-KAR

Page 2 of 3

Though files are taken back under acknowledgment by the petitioner on 22.12.2025, till date no alternative arrangement is made. However, in the interest of justice, finally matter is adjourned to 06.10.2026.

On the next date of hearing, if there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, it is made clear that petition shall be dismissed for non- prosecution."

2. Inspite of the aforesaid order, no arrangements have been made to represent the petitioner before this Court nor has the petitioner appeared in-person before this Court.

3. Under the circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

DN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead