Karnataka High Court

WP/24318/2024 of DR V SHIVEGOWDA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 6 October 2026

2026:KHC:55756

CNR: KAHC010508442024 NC: 2026:KHC:55756 WP No. 24318 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION No.24318 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: DR V SHIVEGOWDA S/O R C VENKATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

WRIT PETITION No.24318 OF 2024 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

DR V SHIVEGOWDA

S/O R C VENKATEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

R/AT SAI UDHAY MOHAN APARTMENT,

F-2, 2ND FLOOR,

APPAREDDY PALYA,

INDHIRA, BANGALORE,

PRESENTLY WORKING AT

CMO TALUK HOSPITAL,

DEVANAHALLI,

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT,

BANGALORE.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI PONNANNA M B, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY

HIGH GROUNDS POLICE STATION,

BENGALURU-560 032

2.

SMT. SAVITHA

W/O SURESH B P,

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

R/AT NO.703,

RENAISSANCE CRAGS,

150, IST MAIN ROAD,

Digitally

signed by R

MANJUNATHA

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

Page 1 of 3

SESHADRIPURAM,

BENGALURU-560 032

…RESPONDENTS

(BY

SMT.K.P.YASHODHA,

ADDITIONAL

GOVERNMENT

ADVOCATE FOR R-1;

SRI ASHOK B. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO QUASH THE

ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.23944/2019 AT ANNEXURE-B

PENDING

ON

THE

FILE

OF

8TH

ADDITIONAL

CHIEF

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU FOR ALLEGED

OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 504, 506 OF

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

ORAL ORDER

Parties present. Joint memo signed by the parties and their respective advocates, filed.

2. Contents of the joint memo read over to the parties. They admit that terms of the joint memo depict true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue influence or coercion in filing the joint memo.

HC-KAR

Page 2 of 3

3. There is a criminal case filed by the petitioner against respondent No.2 and others.

4. It is agreed among the parties that if a petition is filed seeking quashing of criminal case filed by the petitioner herein against respondent No.2 and others, petitioner herein has no objection for quashing the same.

5. Accordingly, placing the joint memo on record, the following:

ORDER

i. Petition is allowed in terms of the joint memo. ii. Consequently, case in C.C No.23944/2019 pending on the file of the VIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Bengaluru, stands quashed. iii. Ordered accordingly.

Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 55 CT:VRR

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead