Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/5379/2023 of SRI. VACHAN G SHETTY Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 6 October 2026

2026:KHC:55749

CNR: KAHC010310872023 NC: 2026:KHC:55749 CRL.P No. 5379 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5379 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. SRI VACHAN G SHETTY S/O GANESH SHETTY AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5379 OF 2023

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI VACHAN G SHETTY

S/O GANESH SHETTY

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

R/AT. SANGAM HOUSE

NETHRAVATHI, AJAKURI

DHARMASTHALA GRAMA

BELTHANGADY TALUK - 574 214.

2.

SRI PRASNNA

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

S/O ANANDADEVADIGA

R/AT SARIMAJALU HOUSE

PANAJALLU, KUVATTU VILLAGE

BELTHANGADYTALUK - 574 214

ALSO AT DURGANAGAR

MUNDUOORU VILLAGE

BELTHANGADY - 574 214.

3.

SRI SABASTINA P.D

AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

S/O LATE DEVAIAH

R/AT. PANANDANATH HOUSE

PUDUVETTU VILLAGE POST

BELTHANGADU - 574 216.

4.

SRI SUDHINDRA

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

S/O SRINIVAS POOJARY

R/AT. BAYITYAR HOUSE

PUDUVETTU VILLAGE AND POST

BELTHANGADY - 574 216.

5.

SRI HARISH

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

S/O SHEKAR DEVADIGA

Digitally

signed by

NANDINI M S

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

Page 1 of 7

R/AT NUMBER E 2-344

BEDRABHETTU HOUSE

BANGADI, INDABETTU VILLAGE

BELTHANGADY - 574 214.

6.

SRI P.S. CHETHAN SHARMA

AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

S/O SUBRAYA GOWDA

R/AT. PATTADURU VILLAGE

BELLUR POST, MUDIGERE TALUK

CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 132.

7.

SRI MANJUNATH

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

S/O MOHAN, R/AT P B ROAD

MOODIGERE TALUK

CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 132.

8.

SRI M.D. MANJUNATH

AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS

S/O DIBBAYA AT DIVANGATHA

R/AT MOODIGERE VILLAGE

BELLUR POST, MOODIGERE TALUK

CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 132.

9.

SRI UMESH

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

S/O NANJEGOWDA

R/AT KANNACHURU VILLAGE

HANTURU POST, MUDIGERE TALUK

CHIKMAGALUR - 577 132.

10.

SRI MANJUNATH

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

S/O MARIGOWDA

R/AT JOONAGNAKERE VILLAGE POST

MOODIGERE TALUK, CHIKMAGALUR

DISTRICT - 577 132.

11.

SRI JAHAVAR WASIM ULLA

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

S/O JIYAA ULLA

R/AT. NUMBER 26-3RD CORSS

RAMAYYA LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE

HC-KAR

Page 2 of 7

BANGALORE - 560 058

C/O SHUBASH NAGAR

BEHALGULA VILLAG

MOODIGERE TALUK

CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 132.

12.

SRI IMTIAZ ALI

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

S/O KIZAR KHAN

R/AT SHUBADHNAGAR

BELAGULA VILLAGE

MOODIGERE TALUK

CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 132.

13.

SRI H.E. RAGHU

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

S/O. ERAPPA POOJARY

R/AT CHANNAPURA VILLAGE AND POST

GONIBEEDU HOBLI, MOODIGERE TALUK

CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 132.

14.

SRI MOHAN

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS

S/O SHESHAPPA GOWDA

R/AT MUKKUDA HOUSE

CHIBIDRE VILLAGE

KAKKINJE POST

BELTHANGADY TALUK - 574 228.

15.

SRI ANIL KUMAR

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

S/O KRISHNA MOGHAVEERA

KODYARA HOUSE

BEEJADI VILLAGE

KOTESHWRA POST

KUNDAPUR TALUK

UDUPI DISTRIC - 576 201.

16.

SRI GIRISH

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

S/O PADMEGOWDA

R/AT HUGGEHALLI

BETTADA HOUSE POST

HC-KAR

Page 3 of 7

MODDIGERE TALUK

CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 123.

17.

SRI USMAN

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

S/O AMMABBA

R/AT BARAYA PALKE HOUSE

KUVETTU VILLAGE

BELTHANGADY TALUK - 574 224.

18.

SRI SUDHIR

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

S/O NARAYANA

R/AT HOSAMATA HOUSE

CHARMADI VILLAGE POST

BELTHANGADY TALUK - 574 228.

19.

SRI MADHUKARA

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

S/O BHOMMEGOWDA

THIRAPURA VILLAGE

GUTTHI POST, BHANKAL HOBLI

MOODIGERE TALUK

CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 132.

20.

SRI DINESH

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

S/O SOMA KUMBAARA

CHANDRAKRUPA HOUSE

VIVEKANANDA NAGAR

LAILA VILLAGE, UJIRE POST

BELTHANGADY TALUK - 574 240.

21.

SRI SHARATH H S

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

S/O SHIVANNA GOWDA

HALLI BALIU HOUSE

HESAGUDU VILLAGE

GUTTHI POST, MOODIGER TALUK

CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 132.

22.

SRI GANGADHARA

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

S/O KEMPAYYA

HC-KAR

Page 4 of 7

R/AT VIVEKANANDA NAGAR HOUSE

LAILA VILLAGE, UJIRE POST

BELTHANGADY TALUK - 574 240.

23.

SRI NISAR AHMAD

AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

S/O SHAYAD BASGA SABH

R/AT ADRSHA NAGAR

LAILA VILLAGE POST

BELTHANGADY TALUK - 574 214.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI RAKSHITH KUMAR, ADV.)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY BELTHANGADY POLICE STATION

MANGALORE, D.K

REPRESENTED BY SPP

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

BENGALURU - 560 001.

2.

POLICE SUB INSPECTOR

BELTHANGADY CIRCLE POLICE STATION

BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K - 574 214.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI RAHUL RAI K, HCGP)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE

ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.1600/2022 REGISTERED BY THE

RESPONDENT NO.2 POLICE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 79 AND 80 OF

KARNATAKA POLICE ACT 1963, PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BELTHANGADY, D.K.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

ORAL ORDER

1. Petitioners are before this Court in this petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. with a prayer to quash the entire

HC-KAR

Page 5 of 7

proceedings in CC No.1600/2022 pending before the Court of Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Belthangadi, Dakshina Kannada, arising out of Crime No.33/2022 registered by Belthangadi Police Station, Dakshina Kannada, for the offence punishable under Section 79 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners having reiterated the grounds urged in the petition submits that Section 155(2) of Cr.P.C. has not been complied in the present case. Accordingly, he prays to allow the petition.

3. Learned HCGP, who has opposed the petition, does not dispute the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners.

4. FIR has been registered in the present case for the offence punishable under Section 79 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, which is undisputedly non-cognizable offence. Therefore, compliance of Section 155(2) of Cr.P.C. becomes very much necessary prior to registration of FIR.

HC-KAR

Page 6 of 7

5. A reading of the order sheet of the Trial Court in the present case would go to show that Investigation Officer has not complied the requirement of Section 155(2) of Cr.P.C. No order has been passed by the jurisdictional Magistrate as provided under the said provision of law, prior to registration of FIR. Under the circumstances, the impugned criminal proceedings cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the following order:-

6. The criminal petition is allowed. The entire proceedings in CC No.1600/2022 pending before the Court of Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Belthangadi, Dakshina Kannada, arising out of Crime No.33/2022 registered by Belthangadi Police Station, Dakshina Kannada, for the offence punishable under Section 79 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, is hereby quashed as against the petitioners herein.

Sd/-

(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

DN/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3

Page 7 of 7

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead