Karnataka High Court
COMAP/355/2026 of INNOMAC ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES Vs MR. T. MUNISWAMY REDDY on 5 October 2026
2026:KHC:33198
NC: 2026:KHC:33198 MFA No. 4602 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4602 OF 2026 (CPC) BETWEEN: INNOMAC ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4602 OF 2026 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
INNOMAC ENGINEERING
INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED
HAVING ITS REGISTERED
OFFICE AT, 3RD FLOOR
NO.13, NARAYAN NAGAR
1ST BLOCK, ANAJANAPURA
MAIN ROAD, DODDAKALLASANDRA
BANGALORE, KARNATAKA - 560 062
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
MR. RAJAMURTHY M. R.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI GANAPATHI NARAYANA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MR. T. MUNISWAMY REDDY
S/O. MRS. LAKSHMAMMA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/AT. KONDENAHALLI, MUDUVADI
KOLAR, KARNATAKA - 563 126.
2.
MR. JAGADEESHA V
S/O. MR. VENKATESHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/AT.NO.49, CHANNAGIRI TALUK
JOLADALAHALLI, DAVANAGERE
KARNATAKA - 577 213.
3.
MBS GLOBAL INNOVATION
MACHINERY PVT. LTD.
Digitally signed
by
GAVRIBIDANUR
SUBRAMANYA
GUPTA
SREENATH
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
Page 1 of 2
OFFICE AT SY.NO.180/125/2
HANCHIPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI
NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE
RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI B. RAVINDRA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 TO C/R3)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE 1(R) OF
THE CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
23.04.2026 PASSED ON IA.NO.2 IN COM.O.S.NO.251/2026 BY
LXXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant is present.
2. Registry has raised objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal on the ground that the impugned order has been passed in exercise of the Commercial Court jurisdiction. Hence, the objection raised by Registry is sustained. Consequently, the appeal is held to be not maintainable.
3. Learned counsel for appellant seeks leave of this Court to convert this appeal into a Commercial Appeal.
HC-KAR
4. Permission is accorded.
5. The appellant is permitted to convert the this appeal into a Commercial Appeal in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the appeal is disposed off for statistical purposes.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…