Karnataka High Court
WP/30123/2026 of SRI G. MUNIRAJU, Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010659632026 NC: 2026:KHC:55177 WP No. 30123 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.30123 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. G. MUNIRAJU, S/O GIRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 67
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO.30123 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. G. MUNIRAJU,
S/O GIRIGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
R/AT NO.45/2,
CHIKKANAGAMANGALA VILLAGE,
DODDANAGAMANGALA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560099.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ARAVIND H., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION,
BENGALURU-560007.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR,
ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562106.
…RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by
CHAYA S A
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
(BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
DIRECT
THE
RESPONDENT
NO.3
TO
CONSIDER
THE
REPRESENTATIONS DATED 10.01.2022, VIDE ANNEXURE -J
AND 14.06.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE K AND MUTATE THE NAME
OF THE PETITIONER IN THE COMPUTER PAHANI AS PER THE
DIRECTION ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT I.E. ASSISTANT
COMMISSIONER,
BENGALURU
SOUTH
SUB-DIVISION,
BENGALURU, AS PER ANNX-H, BEARING NO. RA (A) NO.
761/2021 DATED 20/12/2021 FORTHWITH.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Sri. Aditya Diwakara, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a direction to respondent No.3-Tahsildar to consider the representations at Annexures-J and K, in terms of the
HC-KAR
order passed by respondent No.2 in R.A.(A) No.761 of 2021 at Annexure-H.
3. Heard Sri. Aravind H., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Aditya Diwakara, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State.
4. In that view of the matter, respondent No.3- Tahsildar is directed to consider the representations at Annexures-J and K, in accordance with law and in terms of the order passed by respondent No.2 in R.A.(A) No.761 of 2021, within an outer limit of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20