Karnataka High Court
WP/31161/2026 of SMT. NIRMALA KEERTHI Vs THE GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY, on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010684242026 NC: 2026:KHC:55267 WP No. 31161 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 31161 OF 2026 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NIRMALA KEERTHI WIFE OF SHRI S.M.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 31161 OF 2026 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. NIRMALA KEERTHI
WIFE OF SHRI S.M. KEERTHI,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
2.
SHRI S.M. KEERTHI
SON OF SHRI S.N. MOORTHY,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
NO.84, 4TH CROSS, UAS LAYOUT,
RMV 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU 560094.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SHRAVAN S LOKRE.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF COMMISSIONER,
HUDSON CIRCLE, N.R. SQUARE,
BENGALURU 560002.
Digitally
signed by
VANAMALA
N
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER,
BENGALURU NORTH CITY CORPORATION,
GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY,
JAKKUR DIVISION,
DEFENCE COLONY, 9TH MAIN ROAD,
SAHAKARA NAGAR,
BENGALURU 560092.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER/NOTICE PASSED
BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, NAMELY, THE JOINT
COMMISSIONER,
GREATER
BENGALURU
AUTHORITY, NORTH ZONE-1, JAKKUR DIVISION, UNDER SECTION 243(3)(C) OF THE GREATER
BENGALURU GOVERNANCE ACT, 2024, BEARING
REFERENCE
NO.
JC/2-1/BNCC/PO/37/26-27
DATED 03.06.2026, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO AFFORD THE
PETITIONERS A REASONABLE AND EFFECTIVE
OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING AND TO CONDUCT
PROPER
ENQUIRY
AND
INSPECTION
IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LAW BEFORE TAKING ANY
FURTHER ACTION IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY.
HC-KAR
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS
MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
After being heard for some time, Mr. Shravan S. Lokre, the learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw the petition without prejudice to file response to the impugned Show Cause Notice under Section 243(3)(c) of the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act, 2024.
The request is accepted and the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file response to the Show Cause Notice.
SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
RB