Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/13353/2026 of GURRALA POORNACHANDER REDDY Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010602992026 NC: 2026:KHC:55507 CRL.P No. 13353 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13353 OF 2026 BETWEEN: GURRALA POORNACHANDER REDDY S/O GURRALA

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13353 OF 2026

BETWEEN:

GURRALA POORNACHANDER REDDY

S/O GURRALA VIJAYABHASKAR REDDY

AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

OCCUPATION SALES DEVELOPMENT

REPRESENTATIVE, R/AT H.NO.3-61

KATNEPALLY, CHOPPADANDI MANDAL

KATNEPALLE, KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT

TELANGANA - 505 531

PRESENTLY RESIDING AT

NO.171, SANCHAR NAGAR

MCECHS LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR,

HBR LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 077.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI DILRAJ JUDE ROHIT SEQUEIRA, ADV., FOR

SRI NAVEEN KUMAR G.M, ADV.)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY THE STATION

HOUSE OFFICER, GOVINDPURA POLICE STATION

REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC

PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

BENGALURU - 560 001.

2.

KUM. SHAALINI S.K.

AGED ABOUT YEARS

R/A NO. 362, 3RD A MAIN RD

HBR LAYOUT 2ND BLOCK

1ST STAGE, HBR LAYOUT

BENGALURU - 560 084.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI RAHUL RAI K, HCGP FOR R-1;

R-2 SERVED)

Digitally

signed by

NANDINI M S

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 438 CR.P.C (U/S 482 BNSS)

PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PRESENT CRL.P AND DIRECT THE

RESPONDENT GOVINDPURA POLICE THAT IN THE EVENT OF ARREST

OF THE PETITIONER GURRALA POORNACHANDER REDDY, IN

CONNECTION WITH ANY COMPLAINT/FIR ARISING OUT OF THE

ALLEGATIONS

CONCERNING

THE

DE-FACTO

COMPLAINANT

KUM.SHAALINI.S.K, BEFORE THE HONBLE COURT OF LIII ADDL.CITY

CIVIL AND SESSIONS AND SPECIAL JUDGE AT BANGALORE

INCLUDING AN OFFENCE ALLEGED U/S 69 OF BNS, 2023 OR ANY

ALLIED/COGNATE OFFENCE ARISING FROM THE SAME SET OF

FACTS, THE PETITIONER BE RELEASED ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

1. Petitioner is before this Court in this petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail pursuant to the complaint submitted by respondent no.2 for the offence punishable under Section 69 of BNS,2023.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP on behalf of respondent no.1. Respondent no. 2, who is served in the matter has remained unrepresented before this Court.

HC-KAR

3. The petitioner who had received a phone call from the brother of respondent no.2 and had threatened the petitioner about filing criminal case against him for offence punishable under Section 69 of the BNS, 2023 apprehending arrest had approached the jurisdictional Sessions Court in Crl.Misc.No.7947 of 2026, which was rejected on 24.08.2026. Therefore, he is before this Court.

4. Learned HCGP on instructions submits that till date, no complaint has been received either from respondent no.2 or from her brother against the petitioner with regard to commission of offence punishable under Section 69 of BNS, 2023 or any other offence. Therefore, the apprehension expressed by the petitioner at this stage is misconceived.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner in reply submits that the said submission may be taken on the record and this petition may be disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, in the event, FIR is registered against him based on the complaint of respondent no.2 herein.

HC-KAR

6. The submissions made on both sides is placed on record.

7. Criminal petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner as aforesaid.

8. It is needless to state that the requirements of Section 35 of BNSS, 2023 would be strictly complied by the respondent - police, in the event of they registering a FIR against the petitioner, pursuant to the complaint by respondent no.2.

Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

NMS/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 94

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead