Karnataka High Court
WP/7628/2023 of MR. FEDRICK NAZARETH Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010174372023 NC: 2026:KHC:55117 WP No. 7628 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 7628 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. FEDRICK NAZARETH AGED 78 YEARS, S/O LATE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO. 7628 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. FEDRICK NAZARETH
AGED 78 YEARS,
S/O LATE MOURICE NAZARETH
R/A #2-91, THREE STAR VILLA,
BIRAVU HOUSE, HOSABETTU
MOODBIDRI TALUK
DAKSHINA KANNADA
KARNATAKA - 574227
…PETITIONER
(BY
SRI
SIDHARTH
N
GOWDA,
ADVOCATE
FOR
SRI VENKATESH SOMAREDDI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, ROOM NO.505
5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE - 560001.
2.
REGULARIZATION COMMITTEE
REPRESEBTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
TAHSILDAR, MOODBIDRI TALUK,
DAKSHINA KANNADA
KARNATAKA - 574227.
Digitally signed by
CHAYA S A
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
TAHSILDAR, MOODBIDRI TALUK,
MOODBIDRI, DAKSHINA KANNADA
KARNATAKA - 574227.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH THE NOTICE DTD 07.01.2023 BEARING NO. TOMDB- REVONCR/7/2023/219010
VIDE
ANNX-K
SENT
BY
THE
TAHSILDAR
MOODBIDRI/RESPONDENT
NO.3
TO
THE
PETITIOENR HEREIN AND ETC.,.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN `B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondent - Authorities to consider Form No.50 filed by the petitioner seeking regularization of the land in question at Annexure-A and sought for quashing Annexure-K dated 07.01.2023.
HC-KAR
3. In this regard, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent - State places reliance on the resolution dated 04.02.2023/06.02.2023 passed by the competent Authority rejecting the Form No.50 filed by the petitioner.
4. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. However, as the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the resolution dated 04.02.2023/06.02.2023 as stated above, no further orders are required to be made on Annexure-K.
5. It is open for the petitioner to challenge the order dated 04.02.2023/06.02.2023 before the competent Authority.
6. In the meanwhile, at this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks two months time to file appropriate appeal against the order dated 04.02.2023/06.02.2023.
HC-KAR
7. In that view of the matter, the interim order granted by this Court on 20.04.2023 shall continue for a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order to enable the petitioner to approach the competent Authority by way of appeal.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52