Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/4815/2024 of SRI K T SHIVA PRAKASH Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010217522024 NC: 2026:KHC:55346 CRL.P No. 4815 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4815 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K.T SHIVA PRAKASH S/O LATE K.M. THIMMAIAH, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4815 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. K.T SHIVA PRAKASH
S/O LATE K.M. THIMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.282,
NEW BAZAAR STREET,
KRISHNARAJAPURAM,
BENGALURU - 560 035.
2.
SMT. VIJAYAMMA KRISHNAPPA,
W/O KRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.2/48,
C.R.PALIYAM, DEVEGANPALLI,
KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT
TAMIL NADU STATE - 635 114
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SAMUEL S DANDIN, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
K.R.PURAM POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BANGALORE
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SRI SYED ROSHAN,
S/O SYED AMEER JAN,
AGE 38 YEARS,
R/AT NO.155, SANJAYANAGAR,
DIESEL SHED ROAD,
K.R.PURAM,
BENGALURU - 36
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESH P, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.978/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF
X
A.C.M.M
BENGALURU
FOR
THE
OFFENCE
P/U/S
120(B),419,420,448,467 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
HC-KAR
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
CR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6