Karnataka High Court
WP/31240/2026 of SRI KALLUR RAJAKUMAR Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010689052026 NC: 2026:KHC:55115 WP No. 31240 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 31240 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI KALLUR RAJAKUMAR S/O. RAMANJULU NAIDU AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO. 31240 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI KALLUR RAJAKUMAR
S/O. RAMANJULU NAIDU
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 30,
1ST CROSS, RPC LAYOUT,
VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE
VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 040.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NAVEEN G.S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU - 560001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
OF LAND RECORDS,
MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 430.
Digitally signed by
CHAYA S A
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
THE LAND SURVEYOR,
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT
DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS,
MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 430.
4.
THE TAHSILDAR,
MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 430.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
NOTICE SIGNED AND ISSUED BY R3 FIXING THE DATES OF
HOLDING SURVEY ON 08.09.2026 PRODUCED AT ANNX-E ON
18.09.2026
PRODUCED
AS
ANNX-G
AND
06.10.2026
PRODUCED AT ANNX-K IN SO FAR AS THE SAME PURPORT TO
CALL
UPON/COMPEL
THE
PETITIONER
TO
SUBMIT
TO
SURVEY/HADDHBUSTH IN RESPECT OF SY. NO.429/1
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents.
2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the notice (Annexure-K) issued by the respondent -
HC-KAR
Authorities to conduct survey in respect of the subject land.
3. In that view of the matter, as the respondents are conducting the survey in respect of the subject land, as mentioned in Annexure-K, which is the public duty cast on the respondent - Authorities, I am of view that, no interference is called for in this writ petition.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40