Karnataka High Court
WP/30599/2026 of DR. MAHENDRA JAIN Vs SMT. MALA JAIN KANTHARAJAIAH@ MALA VINSEL on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010670152026 NC: 2026:KHC:55287 WP No. 30599 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 30599 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. DR. MAHENDRA JAIN AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O LATE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION NO. 30599 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
DR. MAHENDRA JAIN
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
S/O LATE SRI P. KANTHARAJAIAH
R/A NO.206/15, 2ND FLOOR,
10TH D MAIN, NOW KNOWN AS,
4 TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR FIRST BLOCK,
BENGALURU 560011.
2.
SMT. MALINI JAIN
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
W/O DR. MAHENDRA JAIN,
R/A 0.206/15 2ND FLOOR, 10TH D
MAIN, NOW KNOWN AS, 4 TH MAIN,
JAYANAGAR FIRST BLOCK,
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. T.V. SUBRAMANYA PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. MALA JAIN KANTHARAJAIAH
@ MALA VINSEL
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA B S
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
D/O LATE SRI P. KANTHARAJAIAH
W/O JAMES DAVID DOUGLAS VINSEL
R / EPSILON 5442,
NW SKY CREST PARKWAY
PORTLAND OR 97229
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
PRESENTLY RESIDING AND OWNING
THE GROUND FLOOR,
MUNICIPAL NO.206/15,
PID NO.62-54-15, 10TH D MAIN,
NOW KNOWN AS, 4TH MAIN,
JAYANAGAR FIRST BLOCK,
BENGALURU 560011.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT
OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 21.07.2026
PASSED BY THE IX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSONS JUDGE, AT BANGALORE IN O.S NO.4553 OF 2026 (ANNEXURE-A)
ALLOWING THE APPLICATION UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1
AND 2 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 NUMBERED
AS IA NO. 4 AND ETC,.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Office has raised objection regarding maintainability of the petition in view of Order 43 Rule 1(r) of CPC.
In view of office note, writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable with liberty to the petitioners to file appeal as available in accordance with law.
If request is made to return the certified copies, the Registry shall consider the same.
SD/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41