Karnataka High Court
WP/31170/2026 of SRI.B.S.PRASAD Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010679352026 NC: 2026:KHC:55372 WP No. 31170 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 31170 OF 2026 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.B.S.PRASAD S/O LATE. B.D. SIDDAPPA, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION NO. 31170 OF 2026 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI.B.S.PRASAD
S/O LATE. B.D. SIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER,
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
BANGALURU,
R/AT NO.37, 12TH CROSS,
IDEAL HOME TOWNSHIP,
RAJA RAJESHWARI,
BENGALURU-560 098
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR B O., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER,
GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY
N.R.SQUARE, CORPORATION CIRCLE,
BENGALURU - 560 002
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. RASHMI RAO, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
Digitally signed
by VIDYA G R
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO (I) TO ISSUE AN
ORDER OF DIRECTION OR A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF
CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ARTICLES OF CHARGE
BEARING NO. NA.AA.E 405 MNU 2024 DATED 08.07.2025
(ANNEXURE-A) ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed by the petitioner, a retired Chief Engineer of the Greater Bengaluru Authority [GBA] who attained superannuation at the age of 60 years on 30.04.2020, challenging the Articles of Charges at Annexure-'A' dated 08.07.2025.
2. It is contended that the respondent - GBA has adopted the Karnataka Civil Service Rules [KCSR] applicable to the Government Servants and in terms of Rule 214(2)(b)(ii), the Articles of Charges framed more than four years after the incident would be impermissible.
HC-KAR
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-GBA would submit that the enquiry was initiated pursuant to the report of Justice H.N.Nagamohan Das Committee and accordingly, there was delay.
4. Admittedly, the Articles of Charges are framed on 08.07.2025, copies of which are enclosed at Annexure-'A'. The Articles of Charges refer to certain works relating to improvement of drains and culverts in Lottegollahalli and Venkatachari and Venkatachari layout in Ward No.100, Short recovery of royalty, depot collection and procedural lapses relating to the year 2007-2008, engaging of private labourers for desilting relating to flood relief during the monsoon of 2008, depot collection in Ward No.5 relating to the year 2007-2008 and such other works relating to the year 2007-2008.
5. The petitioner has made out his reply to the show cause notice and specifically adverted to the delay in
HC-KAR
initiating proceedings and has referred to Rule 214(2)(b) of KCSR. Rule 214(2)(b) reads as follows: "214 2[(1)(a) Withholding or withdrawing pension for misconduct or negligence.-
(2) (a) xxx
(b) The departmental proceedings, if not instituted while the Government servant was in service, whether before his retirement or during his re-employment.-
(i) shall not be instituted save with the sanction of the Government.
(ii) shall not be in respect of any event which took place more than four years before such institution, and
(iii) shall be conducted by such authority and in such place as the Government may direct and in accordance with the procedure applicable to departmental proceedings in which an order of dismissal from service could be made in relation to the Government servant during his service."
6. It is clear in terms of Rule 214(2)(b)(ii) of KCSR that enquiry shall not be instituted in respect of any event
HC-KAR
which took place more than four years before such institution.
7. The date of institution of an enquiry is the date of issuance of Articles of Charges. If 08.07.2025 is taken to be the date of institution of enquiry, the acts complained of relate to the year 2007-2008. If that were to be so, the enquiry is hit by the bar under Rule 214(2)(b)(ii) and there is no question of any condonation when the Rule does not provide for condonation of delay and the Rules do not provide for delayed institution of enquiry.
8. Admittedly, the petitioner has attained superannuation on 30.04.2020. The Articles of Charges are framed on 08.07.2025 and relate to the incidents of the year 2007-2008. Accordingly, the impugned action is impermissible in terms of Rule 214(2)(b)(ii) of KCSR.
HC-KAR
9. Accordingly, the Articles of Charges at Annexure-'A' dated 08.07.2025 are set aside and as also the enquiry proceedings.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VGR