Karnataka High Court
WP/27559/2019 of M SHIVAKUMAR Vs CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010175942019 NC: 2026:KHC:55085-DB WP No. 27559 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.BHARATH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 27559 OF 2019 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.BHARATH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 27559 OF 2019 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
M. SHIVAKUMAR
S/O CHIKKAMARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
2.
KRISHNAPPA
S/O KEMPANNA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
3.
RAMACHANDRAPPA N.K.
S/O KEMPANNA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
4.
SHIVANNA
S/O CHIKKAMUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
5.
KANAKARAJ M.
S/O G. MUNIGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
6.
MUNISHAMEGOWDA M.
S/O MUNIKEMPANNA
AGED ABOUT45 YEARS
Digitally
signed by
RAKSHA
Location:
high court
of karnataka
HC-KAR
7.
DEVARAJA N.S.
S/O SHIVAMURTHI
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
8.
S. MAREGOWDA
S/O SONNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
9.
K. SHIVAKUMAR
S/O N.K. KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
NAGARENAHALLI, BEGUR,
HOSAKOTE TALUK-562 122,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ROOPESHA B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE ZILLA PANCHAYATH,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
K.G. ROAD, KALIDASA MARG,
GANDHI NAGAR, BENGALURU,
KARNATAKA - 560009.
2.
PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFICER
DODDARALAGERE GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
HOSKOTE TALUK - 562 122,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
3.
PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
KAMABLLIPURA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
HOSKOTE TALUK - 562122,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
HC-KAR
4.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE TALUK PANCHAYATH,
HOSKOTE TALUK - 562122,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KARTHIK N., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. M.S. DEVARAJU ,ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE
ANY APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DIRECTION OR A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO
CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED: 12/02/2019 AND
18/02/2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-D, E, F & G AND ETC.,
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.BHARATH KUMAR
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
1. This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs; "Issue any appropriate order or direction or a Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representations dated: 12/02/2019 and 18/02/2019 vide annexure-D, E, F & G.
Grant such other relief's as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case including the cost of this proceedings, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel appearing for the Panchayath.
3. Learned Government Advocate submits that the Government is not a party to this writ petition and that there is no land allotted to any Solid Waste Management Unit in Sy.No.68 of Nagarenahalli village, Hoskote Taluk, as of now. It is submitted that the Tahsildar has instructed that out of 30 acres available in the said survey number ie., Sy.No.68 of Nagarenahalli village, 25 acres
HC-KAR
has been allotted to I.T / B.T. Department and 5 acres still remains in the Government's name. Learned counsel for the Panchayath also submits that there is no implementation of Solid Waste Management Unit in the land in question.
4. In the above view of the matter, we are of the opinion that nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition which was filed in the year 2019.
5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Incase the petitioners have any further grievance, the same can be adjudicated in accordance with law.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (K.S.BHARATH KUMAR) JUDGE
GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9