Karnataka High Court
WP/3614/2025 of SRI. MOHAMED ASHRAF ARAKKAL KOOTTINTAKAYIL Vs STATE BY YESHWANTHPUR P. S. on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010080682025 NC: 2026:KHC:55368 WP No. 3614 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 3614 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MOHAMED ASHRAF ARAKKAL KOOTTINTAKAYIL S/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
WRIT PETITION NO. 3614 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. MOHAMED ASHRAF ARAKKAL KOOTTINTAKAYIL
S/O ARAKKAL VETTATH AHMEDKUTTY
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
R/A PUDUMANASSERY, PAVARATTY P.O.,
PAVARATTY, THRISSUR
KERALA - 680 507.
2.
SMT. SHAJITHA MOHAMED ASHARAF
W/O MOHAMED ASHRAF ARAKKAL KOOTINTAKAYIL, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/A PUDUMANASSERY, PAVARATTY P.O., PAVARATTY, THRISSUR
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PAVAN A, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE BY YESHWANTHPUR P. S.
BANGALORE - 560 003.
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
Digitally signed
by ASHWINI
MAYAPPA
MAVARAKAR
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
SRI. CLEETUS FRANCIS
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
S/O FRANCIS
RESIDING AT CLIPPI HOUSE
T,C, 13/287, E.M.S NAGAR
CHERIYA, KANNIYAN KANDIYIL
NAGAPURAM, PUTTUR,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
KERALA - 695 235.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP FOR R1; R2 SERVED)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING R/W SEC. 528 OF THE
BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO ISSUE NOTICE
UNDER
S.41A
OF
Cr.P.C/S.
35(3)
OF
BNSS
TO
THE
PETITIONERS FOR APPEARANCE AND PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY
BEFORE REGISTERING CASE AGAINST THE PETITIONERS ON
THE BASIS OF THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FILED BY THE R-2 IN
THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "The petitioners above named most respectfully submits that the petitioners do not wish to prosecute the above case any further and hereby withdraw the same.
HC-KAR
Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to withdraw the above case and dismiss the same as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.”
Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18