Karnataka High Court
WP/29788/2026 of SMT M PRIYANKA Vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010653192026 NC: 2026:KHC:55183 WP No. 29788 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.29788 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. M. PRIYANKA W/O LATE K.M. MAHESH AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO.29788 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. M. PRIYANKA
W/O LATE K.M. MAHESH
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
R/AT NO.3, KARIOBANAHALLI VILLAGE
YESHWANTHPURA HOBLI
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
BENGALURU – 560 073.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHRIDHARA K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION
BENGALURU – 560 009.
2.
THE TAHSILDAR
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
BENGALURU – 560 009.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
DIRECT RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER AND
DISPOSE
OF
THE
REPRESENTATION
DATED
24.11.2025
Digitally signed by
CHAYA S A
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE C, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORDER DATED 24.09.2025
PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.5202/2022 AND
THE CLARIFICATION ORDER DATED 03.11.2025 (ANNEXURE A
AND B); AND ETC.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Sri. Shamanth Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents.
2. Heard Sri. Shridhara K., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri. Shamanth Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State.
3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for writ of mandamus to the respondent-authorities to consider the representation dated 24.11.2025 produced at Annexure-C.
HC-KAR
4. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is submitted that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 24.11.2025 at Annexure-C, seeking implementation of the order dated 03.11.2025 passed in W.P.No.5202 of 2022.
5. In that view of the matter, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation at Annexure-C submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, within an outer limit of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17