Karnataka High Court
MFA/7837/2014 of S VIDYA SAGAR Vs ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010431722014 NC: 2026:KHC:55244 MFA No. 7837 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7837 OF 2014(MV-I) BETWEEN: S VIDYA SAGAR S/O SREEDHAR S., AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010431722014
NC: 2026:KHC:55244
MFA No. 7837 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7837 OF 2014(MV-I)
BETWEEN:
S VIDYA SAGAR
S/O SREEDHAR S.,
AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS,
R/AT NO.182, RMV II STAGE,
NEW BEL ROAD, KGE LAYOUT,
BANGALORE - 560 094.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI RAMAKRISHNA M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL
INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
PRESTIGE CORNICHE,
NO.62/1, 2ND FLOOR,
RICHMOND ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 025.
POLICE ISSUED BY ITS
OFFICE IN POLICY
NO.3004/54912506/04/000
DATE OF VALIDITY
FROM 9-9-2012 T0 9-9-2013.
2.
MR. K T RAJASHEKAR
PROP SRS TRAVELS
R/AT NO.321, TSP ROAD,
OPP. TO BM COLLEGE,
KALASIPALYAM,
BANGALORE - 560 002.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI B.C.SHIVANNEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; V/C/O DTD 09.03.2026 APPEAL AGAINST R2 IS DISMISSED)
Digitally signed
by ANUSHA V
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010431722014
NC: 2026:KHC:55244
MFA No. 7837 of 2014
THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 3.9.2014 PASSED IN MVC
NO.2742/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE MACT, CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING
THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for respondent no.1 is present. None appears for appellant. On previous date also, there was no representation for appellant and matter was adjourned to provide opportunity. Continued absence would indicate that appellant is not diligently prosecuting appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18