Karnataka High Court
MFA/6000/2015 of SRI B M KRISHNAPPA Vs SRI BHANUCHANDRA S on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010378492015 NC: 2026:KHC:55427 MFA No. 6000 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6000 OF 2015 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B.M. KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010378492015
NC: 2026:KHC:55427
MFA No. 6000 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6000 OF 2015 (MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. B.M. KRISHNAPPA
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
AGGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
2.
SMT. K.S. SHARADAMMA
W/O B.M. KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
NO.BETTAHALLI VILLGE,
SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.P. BHUVAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. BHANUCHANDRA S
S/O SRINIVAS
AGED ABOUT MAJOR
R/AT NO.792, 14TH CROSS,
5TH MAIN, AGRAHARA LAYOUT,
YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE - 560 064.
2.
THE GENERAL MANAGER
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LIMITED,
D.O.V. 143/144,
C.K.N. CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR,
Digitally signed
by ANUSHA V
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010378492015
NC: 2026:KHC:55427
MFA No. 6000 of 2015
1ST MAIN ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM,
BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. A.N. KRISHNA SWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2; VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 29.07.2024, SERVICE OF
NOTICE TO R1 IS HELD SUFFICIENT)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.3.2015 PASSED IN MVC
NO.186/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE 20TH ADDITIONAL SMALL
CAUSES
JUDGE,
MEMBER,
MACT,
BENGALURU,
PARTLY
ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND
SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
On previous date, learned counsel for appellants had submitted that both appellants had died and sought time to file applications.
2. Applications are not filed.
3. In view of above, Appeal is dismissed as abated.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1