Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/10564/2024 of MR. SHARATH RAJ. P. A. Vs ARCHANA. N. R. on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010533192024 NC: 2026:KHC:55349 CRL.P No. 10564 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10564 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MR. SHARATH RAJ. P. A . AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O LATE

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010533192024

NC: 2026:KHC:55349

CRL.P No. 10564 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10564 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

MR. SHARATH RAJ. P. A.

AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,

S/O LATE ASHOK P T,

#918, SAHUKAR CHENNAIAH,

ROAD T K LAYOUT,

MYSURU - 570 009.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. HARISHA N, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

AND:

ARCHANA. N. R.

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,

PERMANENT ADDRESS,

#39, WARD NUMBER 08,

MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT,

CHANNARAYAPATNA

HASSAN DISTRICT,

PRESENTLY RESIDING AT,

#HOUSE NUMBER 78/7

3RD CROSS, JAYALAKSHMIPURAM,

MYSURU.

…RESPONDENT

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528

BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN

CRL.

MISC.NO.1487/2024,

PENDING

BEFORE

THE

IV

Digitally signed

by PANKAJA S

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010533192024

NC: 2026:KHC:55349

CRL.P No. 10564 of 2024

ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSURU, INITIATED BY

THE RESPONDENT UNDER THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call.

2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.

3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.

SD/-

(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

CR/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead