Karnataka High Court
WP/12523/2023 of THE ASST EXECUTIVE ENGINEER Vs THE ASST LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010300802023 NC: 2026:KHC:55388 WP No. 12523 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 12523 OF 2023 (L-PG) BETWEEN: THE ASST EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CAUVERY NEERAVARI
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 12523 OF 2023 (L-PG)
BETWEEN:
THE ASST EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
CAUVERY NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD.,
NO.3, QUALITY CONTROL SUB DIVISION
KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR-572216.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K S BHEEMAIAH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE ASST. LABOUR COMMISSIONER
AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY
BANGALORE DIVISION-1
BANGALORE-560029.
2.
THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND
CONTROLLING AUTHORITY
UNDER PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT
TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR-572101.
3.
THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
3RD FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560001.
4.
SRI G SHIVALINGAIAH
S/O LATE K H GANGADHARAIAH
MAJOR
R/AT NO.383, SHIVA KRUPA
3RD CROSS, 2ND LINK ROAD
S I T LAYOUT
TUMKUR-572102.
HC-KAR
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.M. RAJA KUMAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3:
SRI. K GOVINDARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS ON
THE FILE OF R1 ASST. LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND THE APPELLATE
AUTHORITY, BANGALORE DIVISION-1, BANGALORE, IN GRATUITY
APPEAL NO SAKAABAN-1/PGA (A)/CR-19/2022-23, AND ON THE FILE
OF THE R2, THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PAYMENT OF GRATUITY, AT TUMKUR, IN RESPECT OF CASE NO. KOT/PGA/CR-111/2018-19
AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN
‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 28.09.2022 vide Annexure-A passed by respondent No.2 and the order dated 26.05.2023 vide Annexure-B passed by the respondent No.1.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the question as to whether the period prior to regularization would be counted for the purpose of payment of gratuity is pending before the Apex Court in SLP (Civil) Diary No. 9156/2023 and he further contended that as per the order passed by the Controlling Authority,
HC-KAR
the entire gratuity amount given prior to the date of regularization has been deposited by the petitioner before the Controlling Authority while filing the appeal.
3. Since similar issue is pending before the Apex Court in the above stated petition, this writ petition stands disposed of, with an observation that, if the Apex Court decides the issue in favour of the petitioner and if the Apex Court declares that the period prior to the regularization would not count for the calculation of the gratuity, it is open for the Controlling Authority to refund the amount in favour of the petitioner. In case, if the petitioner fails before the Apex Court, the Controlling Authority is directed to release the amount in favour of respondent No.4. Till then, the Controlling Authority is directed to keep the amount in a fixed deposit.
(H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 57