Karnataka High Court
WP/14088/2022 of THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs SRI P NANJUNDASWAMY on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010309182022 NC: 2026:KHC:55392 WP No. 14088 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 14088 OF 2022 (L-PG) BETWEEN: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 14088 OF 2022 (L-PG)
BETWEEN:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
CHAMARAJANAGARA - 571 313.
2.
THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES
ALI ASKAR ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. RAJA KUMAR M, AGA FOR PETITIONERS)
AND:
1.
SRI P NANJUNDASWAMY
S/O LATE PUTTAMALLAPPA
MAJOR IN AGE
SANTHEMARALLI VILLAGE AND POST
CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK
AND DISTRICT-571115.
2.
LABOUR OFFICER
CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT
CHAMARAJANAGAR-571313.
HC-KAR
3.
ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER
MYSURU DIVISION
MYSURU-570001.
…RESPONDENTS
(R1 TO R3 ARE SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED: 23.10.2020 PASSED BY THE
CONTROLLING AUTHORITY IN CASE NO.KA.AA.CHA/PGA/CR- 39/2017-18 AND ORDER DATED 30.12.2021 NO.SA KAA AA
NAI PGA/MELMANAVI/OTHERS /CR 2021-22 PASSED BY THE
ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER, MYSURU DIVISION, MYSURU BY THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY VIDE ANNEXURE-B
AND A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue in this writ petition is for payment of difference of gratuity during the period the first respondent was working as a daily wages employee, i.e., prior to regularization of his appointment.
2. This issue is pending before Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.564/2020.
HC-KAR
3. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of. Any order passed by the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.564/2020 shall be applicable to the petitioners herein as well. Till then, the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are directed not to seek for implementation of the impugned order.
(H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 43