Karnataka High Court
HRRP/13/2026 of MR H NARAYANA Vs H NAGAMANI on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010351252026 NC: 2026:KHC:55412 HRRP No. 13 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M HOUSE RENT REV. PETITION NO.13 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. MR. H NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O HANUMANTHARAYA,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010351252026
NC: 2026:KHC:55412
HRRP No. 13 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M
HOUSE RENT REV. PETITION NO.13 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. H NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
S/O HANUMANTHARAYA,
RESIDING AT NO.24/39,
GROUND FLOOR, 6TH MAIN ROAD,
DATTATREYANAGAR,
HOSAKEREHALLI, BSK 3RD STAGE,
BENGALURU-560 085.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NARAYANASWAMY K. AND
SRI. RAVI KUMAR R., ADVOCATES - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
H NAGAMANI
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
W/O P.N.NARASIMHALU,
2.
H MANJULAMMA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
W/O P.N.NARASIMHALU,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.24/39,
6TH MAIN ROAD, DATTATREYANAGAR,
HOSAKEREHALLI, BSK 3RD STAGE,
BENGALURU-560 085.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA V., ADVOCATE FOR C/R.1 AND C/R.2.)
Digitally signed by
PREMCHANDRA M R
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010351252026
NC: 2026:KHC:55412
HRRP No. 13 of 2026
THIS HOUSE RENT REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 46(1) OF THE KARNATAKA RENT ACT, 1999, SEEKING
CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS HOUSE RENT REVISION PETITION IS LISTED FOR
ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
The petition was listed on 20.08.2026. On that day, counsel for the petitioner had taken two weeks time to do the needful in the matter i.e., payment of up to date rents.
As of today, the rents are not paid. Moreover, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4