Karnataka High Court
WP/29608/2026 of K.G. CHANDRASHEKAR BHAT Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010645732026 NC: 2026:KHC:55181 WP No. 29608 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.29608 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. K.G. CHANDRASHEKAR BHAT S/O LATE K. GOPAL BHAT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO.29608 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
K.G. CHANDRASHEKAR BHAT
S/O LATE K. GOPAL BHAT
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE
R/O DOOR NO.40/41,
2ND CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
LPO SADASHIV NAGAR,
BENGALURU -560003.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GOPAL K.B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU - 560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
RAMANAGARA TALUKA,
BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT -562159.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION,
Digitally signed by
CHAYA S A
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
RAMANAGARA TALUKA,
BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT -562159.
4.
THE TAHSILDAR,
RAMANAGARA TALUK,
BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT -562159.
5.
THE REVENUE INSPECTOR
BIDADI HOBLI
RAMANAGARA TALUK
BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT – 562 109.
6.
BANDAIAHA
S/O MUTTAIAH
MAJOR IN AGE.
7.
SMT. ERAMMA
W/O OBALAIAH
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK.
8.
SMT. GANGAMMA
W/O OBALAIAH
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK.
9.
SMT. SHIVARATHNAMMA
W/O LATE BASAVARAJ.
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK.
10.
SMT. GOURAMMA
D/O OBALAIAH
AGE : MAJOR,
HC-KAR
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK.
11.
SMT. MANJULA
W/O LATE MUTTURAJ
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK.
12.
SMT. RATHNAMMA
D/O OBALAIAH
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK.
13.
SRI. NAGARAJU B.N.
S/O LATE NANJAPPA.
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC: NOT KNOWN.
14.
SMT. PUSHPALATHA
W/O MANJUNATH,
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK.
15.
SMT. NANJAMMA
W/O RAMAIAH
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK.
16.
SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY
S/O BASAVARAJ
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
OCC: NOT KNOWN.
17.
SMT. YASHODA
D/O KRISHNAMURTHY
HC-KAR
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK.
18.
SRI. MUTHURAJ
S/O OBALAIAH
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
OCC: NOT KNOWN.
19.
SMT. LAVANYA
D/O LATE MUTHURAJ
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK.
20.
SRI. MANJUANTH
S/O LATE KUTHURAJ
AGE 24 YEARS,
OCC : AGRICULTURE.
21.
SMT. NAGAMMA
W/O BANDAIAH
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK.
22.
SRI. MUNIRAJU
S/O BANDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
OCC : AGRICULTURE.
23.
SMT. ANJANAMMA
W/O MUNIRAJU
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC : AGRICULTURE.
24.
SMT. MUTTULAXMI
HC-KAR
W/O NAGARAJ B.N.
AGE :MAJOR,
OCC: AGRICULTURE
25.
SRI. KUMAR KRUTKA
S/O B.N. NAGARAJ
AGE : MAJOR,
OCC :AGRICULTURE.
RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 25 ARE
R/AT BANNEKUPPE VILLAGE,
BIDADI HOBLI
RAMANGAR TALUKU,
BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-562159.
26.
SRI. BALASUBRAMANYAM B.R.,
S/O RAMAKRISHNA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
PROPRIETOR, GSK BUILDERS
AND DEVELOPERS, NO.43,
5TH CROSS, WILSON GARDEN,
BENGALURU.
27.
M/S. GSK BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
BALASUBRAMANHIAN B.R.
NO.43, 5TH CROSS,
WILSON GARDEN,
BENGALURU -560027,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING PARTNER
SRI. BALASUBRAMANYAM,
S/O RAMAKRISHNAPPA.
HC-KAR
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27.11.2025 PASSED BY THE
ASSISTANT
COMMISSIONER,
RAMANAGARA,
IN
R.A.NO.222/2023, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-F; AND ETC.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 5.
2. Heard Sri. Gopal K.B., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri. Shamanth Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State.
3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought to reconsider the mutation proceedings afresh after
HC-KAR
issuing notice to the petitioner and other concerned parties and such other reliefs;
4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, and as the mutation has been effected on the basis of the registered sale deed dated 23.01.2026, it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent Civil Court for adjudication of the dispute, as the matter is civil in nature.
5. In view of the above, no interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15