Karnataka High Court
WP/28950/2023 of MR. YOGESH MEHRA Vs M/S PEARL INSULATIONS PVT LTD., on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010684062023 NC: 2026:KHC:55369 WP No. 28950 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 28950 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. YOGESH MEHRA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS OFFICE AT WIND
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
WRIT PETITION NO. 28950 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
MR. YOGESH MEHRA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
OFFICE AT WIND WORLD TOWER
PLOT NO. A-9, CTS 700
VEERA INDUCTRIAL ESTATE,
VEERA DESAI ROAD, ANDHERI WEST
MUMBAI - 400 053.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANMOHAN P.N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. PEARL INSULATIONS PVT. LTD.,
A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER
THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT
HAVING ITS ADDRESS AT NO. 15/1/2, 20/1B
KEMPALINGANAHALLI, NH48,
KUNIGAL ROAD, NELAMANGALA TALUK
BANGALORE - 562 123
REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE/
DIRECTOR MR. VIKAS KARNAWAT.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SHARATH GOWDA G.B, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by ASHWINI
MAYAPPA
MAVARAKAR
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC. 482 OF THE CR.PC
PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 12/10/2023 PASSED
BY THE XXVIII ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
COURT AT BENGALURU PASSED ON APPLICATION FILED BY
PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 96 R/W 101 IBC, 2016 IN C.C.
NO.
10494/2018
(PRODUCED
AS
ANNEXURE-A)
AND
CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE
PETITIONER AS PRAYED FOR AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "The Petitioner seeks kind leave of this Hon'ble Court to submit that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement in terms of the consent terms filed on 10.08.2026 in CC No.10494/2018 pending before the Court of the XLII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, and the learned Magistrate has passed an order dated 10.08.2026 recording the said settlement.
HC-KAR
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the subject matter of the present writ petition does not survive for consideration and the Petitioner does not wish to prosecute the writ petition any further. A copy of the order dated 10.08.2026 passed in C.C. No.10494/2018 along with the consent terms filed before the said Court is produced herewith for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. Hence, the Petitioner humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the present writ petition and dispose of the same as withdrawn, in the interest of justice.”
Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15