Karnataka High Court
WP/30951/2026 of SMT. NAGAMMA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010679212026 NC: 2026:KHC:55171 WP No. 30951 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.30951 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O. PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 65
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO.30951 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. NAGAMMA
W/O. PUTTASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
R/AT VYASARAJAPURA VILLAGE,
SOSALE HOBLI,
T. NARSIPURA TALUK,
VYASARAJAPURA,
MYSURU - 571120.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MADHUSUDHAN J., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
VIKASA SOUDHA
BENGALURU - 560 020.
2.
THE TASHILDAR
BANGALORE SOUTH,
KG ROAD,
NEAR DISTRICT REGISTRAR OFFICE,
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
SAMPAGI RAM NAGARA
Digitally signed by
CHAYA S A
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
BENGALURU- 560 009.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.2 TO RESTORE ENTRIES IN THE
PAHANI IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER; AND ETC.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.
2. Heard Sri. Madhusudhan J., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri. Aditya Diwakara, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State.
3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the
HC-KAR
representations dated 25.07.2024 and 10.07.2026 at Annexures-A and B respectively.
4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is evident that the name of the petitioner has not been reflected in the revenue records for more than 29 years. In the circumstances, respondent No.2 cannot, at this stage, be directed to consider the representations.
5. However, it is open to the petitioner to establish her right over the property in question in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26