Karnataka High Court

WP/4368/2023 of THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs NANJUNDAPPA. P on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010094472023 NC: 2026:KHC:55391 WP No. 4368 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4368 OF 2023 (L-PG) BETWEEN: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 4368 OF 2023 (L-PG)

BETWEEN:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP. BY THE SERICULTURE EXTENSION OFFICER

TECHNICAL SERVICE CENTRE

CHAMARAJANAGARA.

2.

THE COMMISSIONER FOR SERICULTURE

DEVELOPMENT AND DIRECTOR

OF SERICULTURE

M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI.RAJA KUMAR M, AGA FOR PETITIONERS)

AND:

1.

NANJUNDAPPA. P

S/O. LATE PUTTASWAMAPPA

KAMARAVADI VILLAGE

BANAHALLI POST

CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK

AND DISTRICT-571 115.

2.

THE LABOUR OFFICER AND

CONTROLLING AUTHORITY

CHAMARAJANAGARA-571 313.

…RESPONDENTS

(R1 AND R2 ARE SERVED)

HC-KAR

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL

FOR THE RECORDS IN APPLICATION NO.KAAACHA/PGACR/38/

2017-18 DATED: 23.10.2020 PASSED BY THE LABOR COURT

OFFICER AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT

OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972, CHAMARAJANAGAR (ANNEXURE-A)

AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING

IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS

UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue in this writ petition is for payment of difference of gratuity during the period the first respondent was working as a daily wages employee, i.e., prior to regularization of his appointment.

2. This issue is pending before Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.564/2020.

3. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of. Any order passed by the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.564/2020 shall be applicable to the petitioners herein as well.

HC-KAR

Till then, the respondent No. 2 is directed not to seek for implementation of the impugned order.

(H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE

CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 53

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead