Karnataka High Court
WP/18437/2024 of RAVISHANKAR Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010370242024 NC: 2026:KHC:55073 WP No. 18437 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 18437 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: RAVISHANKAR S/O B.S. PACHAKSHARI AGED ABOUT 65
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010370242024
NC: 2026:KHC:55073
WP No. 18437 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 18437 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
RAVISHANKAR
S/O B.S. PACHAKSHARI
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
R/AT 964, IST FLOOR,
2ND MAIN, M C LAYOUT,
VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 040.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. G.S. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
MINISTRY OF LABOUR,
BENGALURU - 560 002,
REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR,
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
3.
DR. MANORANJANI
W/O DR. RAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/AT NO.17, MATRU ENCLAVE,
AMRUTHA SCHOOL ROAD,
Digitally signed by
MAHALAKSHMI B M
Location: High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010370242024
NC: 2026:KHC:55073
WP No. 18437 of 2024
CHOODASANDRA,
BENGALURU - 560 099.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 AND 2 TO
CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DT. 10/04/2024 AT ANNEXURE-
C4.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous and files a memo to that effect.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
TMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11