Karnataka High Court
WP/21612/2021 of SUVARNA DEVI A N Vs PUSHPASHREE B.N AT AMRITHA on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010444792021 NC: 2026:KHC:55357 WP No. 21612 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 21612 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SUVARNA DEVI A.N, W/O RAJANNA N AGED ABOUT 47
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010444792021
NC: 2026:KHC:55357
WP No. 21612 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
WRIT PETITION NO. 21612 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SUVARNA DEVI A.N,
W/O RAJANNA N
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.15, SRI ANAGHA,
THOTHADA GUDAHALLI ROAD,
SRIKANTAPURA, NAGASANDRA POST,
BANGALORE - 560 073.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. CHAITRA POORNIMA P, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
PUSHPASHREE B.N @ AMRITHA
D/O VISHWANATH R.,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.01,
NEAR DOPLHIN SCHOOL,
THARABANAHALLI, BENGALURU NORTH,
KARNATAKA - 560 002.
2.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY LOKAYUKTA POLICE
(PREVIOUSLY ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU)
BANGALORE - 560 001,
REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.B. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)
Digitally signed
by ASHWINI
MAYAPPA
MAVARAKAR
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010444792021
NC: 2026:KHC:55357
WP No. 21612 of 2021
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC. 482 OF CR.PC
PRAYING TO-QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.30/2021 REGISTERED
BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE ON 07.08.2021 VIDE ANNEXURE- B AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND PENDING ON THE FILE OF
THE HONBLE SPECIAL COURT ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU
(CCH-24), BANGALORE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "The counsel for the petitioner most respectfully submits that the respondent police have filed a charge sheet against the petitioner in the instant case and hence, the matter is infructuous. In view of the same it is prayed that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition, in the interest of justice.”
Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6