Karnataka High Court
WP/5609/2025 of SRI MIR FIAZ AHMED Vs THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (DRB-2) on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010102962025 NC: 2026:KHC:55430 WP No. 5609 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 5609 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SRI MIR FIAZ AHMED, S/O MIR ABDUL KHUDDUS, AGED ABOUT 67
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M
WRIT PETITION NO. 5609 OF 2025 (CS-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI MIR FIAZ AHMED,
S/O MIR ABDUL KHUDDUS,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
R/AT OLD NO.29/3,
NEW NO.170/2, 1ST CROSS,
4TH MAIN, RAMACHANDRAPURA,
BENGALURU-560 021.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRADEEP NAIK K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (DRB-2)
MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003.
2.
THE MANAGER,
THYAGARAJA CO-OP. BANK
NO.5, 9TH CROSS, N.R.COLONY,
BENGALURU-560 019.
3.
SRI. MAQBOOL AHMED,
S/O DASTAGIR SAB,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
NO.7, 2ND CROSS,
1ST FLOOR, KALASIPALYA,
BENGALURU-560 002.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. YOGESH D.NAIK, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. A.DEVARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
Digitally signed by
PREMCHANDRA M R
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 11.02.2026,
NOTICE TO R3 DISPENSED WITH)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN
RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS
UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Pradeep Naik, counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Yogesh D.Naik, Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1 and Sri.A.Devaraja, counsel on behalf of respondent No.2 appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be disposed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record.
HC-KAR
As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is disposed as withdrawn. Because of disposal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56