Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/6362/2020 of MS SAMARA MAHINDRA Vs M/S MAHAVEER INVESTMENTS on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010078812020 NC: 2026:KHC:55134 CRL.P No. 6362 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6362 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. MS. SAMARA MAHINDRA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT: THE
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010078812020
NC: 2026:KHC:55134
CRL.P No. 6362 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6362 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
1.
MS. SAMARA MAHINDRA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT: THE GALLOP BROAD ACRES
STUD FARM, AVALAHALLI ESTATE
YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560064.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ANAND MUTTALLI, ADV.,)
AND:
1.
M/S. MAHAVEER INVESTMENTS
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR
SRI. CHIMANLAL TALREJA
S/O LATE LALCHAND .T
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
NO.45, RADHESHAM KRUPA
NANJAPPA ROAD, SHANTINAGAR
BANGALORE-560027.
REP. BY SPA HOLDER RAJESH .G
S/O GURULINGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO
CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN C.C.NO.5982/2019 ON THE FILE
OF THE HON’BLE XX ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU. QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN
C.C.NO.5982/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE XX
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010078812020
NC: 2026:KHC:55134
CRL.P No. 6362 of 2020
ADDITIONAL
CHIEF
METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE
AT
BENGALURU, IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED &
ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition and it is stated that already matter was disposed of by the trial Court by convicting the petitioner herein, hence, petition has become infructuous.
In view of the memo, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25