Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/830/2024 of G V SATHISH REDDY Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY on 5 October 2026
2026:KHC:55344
CNR: KAHC010043142024 NC: 2026:KHC:55344 CRL.P No. 830 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 830 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. G.V SATHISH REDDY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O LATE G.T
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 830 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
G.V SATHISH REDDY
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
S/O LATE G.T VENKATASWAMY REDDY,
R/AT NO.132, SHETTARABEDI,
VILLAGE, VARTHURU HOBLI,
BENGALURU EAST TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 087.
2.
G.S NAVANEETH
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
S/O G.V SATHISH REDDY,
R/AT NO.132, SHETTARABEDI,
VILLAGE, VARTHURU HOBLI,
BENGALURU EAST TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 087.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VIJAY GOWDA L, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
SHIVAJI NAGAR P.S.
BANGALORE
(REP. BY SPP,
HIGH COURT BUILDING COMPLEX,
BANGALORE - 560 001)
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
Page 1 of 2
2.
AVINASH AGARWAL
S/O MAHEBEER AGARWAL,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
M/S MONDO BUILDERS PVT LTD.,
#6, GPR TOWERS, PARK ROAD
TASKER TOWN, SHIVAJINAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 007
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO
QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A
AND B AND THE PROCEEDINGS THEREON ARISING OUT OF FIR
IN CR.NO.116/2023 DATED 13.09.2023 REGISTERED BY
SHIVAJINAGAR POLICE STATION, FOR OFFENCE P/U/S 406, 420 AND 120B OF IPC, WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE THE
HONBLE LV ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT
BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call.
2. Though this matter is posted for eighth time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the
HC-KAR
petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court.
3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same shall be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-.
SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
CR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…