Karnataka High Court
WP/30955/2026 of SRI.RAMACHANDRE GOWDA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 5 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010681292026 NC: 2026:KHC:55172 WP No. 30955 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.30955 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMACHANDRE GOWDA S/O MOOGEGOWDA, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO.30955 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. RAMACHANDRE GOWDA
S/O MOOGEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
R/AT LINGAPATTANA VILLAGE,
HALAGURU HOBLI,
MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT-571430.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HARSHA KUMAR GOWDA H.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDI,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT
BENGALURU-562159.
Digitally signed by
CHAYA S A
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION,
RAMANAGARA-562159.
4.
TAHASILDAR
KANAKAPURA TALUK
KANAKAPURA – 562117.
5.
SRI. B.S. SHIVANNA
S/O LATE SIDDALINGE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
R/A LINGAPATTANA VILLAGE
HALAGURU HOBLI
MALAVALLI TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT – 571430.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER DATED 17.03.2026 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2
IN RP NO.167/2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-H.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
2. Heard Sri. Harsha Kumar Gowda H.R., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri. Aditya Diwakara, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State.
3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 17.03.2026 passed by respondent No.2 in R.P.No.167 of 2025 produced at Annexure-H.
4. The petitioner claims right over the subject property on the basis of a registered sale deed. On the other hand, respondent No.5 also claims right over the said property on the basis of a registered sale deed dated 29.09.1967.
HC-KAR
5. In view of the rival claims and the dispute with regard to the title and boundaries of the subject property, the petitioner is required to establish his right before the competent Civil Court. The observation made by respondent No.2 relegating the parties to approach the competent Civil Court is, therefore, just and proper. Accordingly, no interference is called for in this writ petition.
6. In the result, the writ petition stands dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28