Karnataka High Court

WP/8027/2024 of MRS. RAJIYA SULTANA Vs BBMP COMMISSIONER on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010146382024 NC: 2026:KHC:54679 WP No. 8027 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 8027 OF 2024 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: MRS. RAJIYA SULTANA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O.

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA

WRIT PETITION NO. 8027 OF 2024 (GM-TEN)

BETWEEN:

MRS. RAJIYA SULTANA

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

W/O. SAYYED ALI,

NO. 146, 16TH CROSS,

MALAGALA, NAGARABHAVI,

2ND STAGE,

BENGALURU - 560 091.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SATISH M.G, ADVOCATE A/W

SRI. MAHESH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

BBMP COMMISSIONER

RAJARAJESHWARI ZONE,

BENGALURU - 560 098.

2.

OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR DIVISION,

BBMP, BENGALURU - 560 054.

3.

SMT. JAYANTHI. S

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

W/O. RAJU,

Digitally signed

by PAVITHRA B

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

R/AT NO. 36, SAJJEPALYA,

SUMMANAHALLI,

BENGALURU - 560 091.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. SANJEEV B.L, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. M.A. SUBRAMANI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE- A ISSUED BY THE R2 UNDER NO/KAPAA A/RARANAVI/P.R. 356

/23-24

DTD

14.02.2024

IN

FAVOUR

OF

THE

THIRD

RESPONDENT AND DIRECT THE R1 AND 2 TO GRANT TENDER

APPLIED FOR BY THE PETITIONER AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The prayer in this writ petition is for quashing of Annexure- A by which the contract of maintenance of RO Plant at Ramakrishnappa Layout was awarded in favour of respondent No.3. The contract awarded was for a period of two years from 14.02.2024. Since the duration of contract itself has

HC-KAR

elapsed, the prayer sought in the petition would not survive for further consideration.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/- (T.P.VIVEKANANDA) JUDGE

JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead