Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/108/2026 of SMT. PREMA Vs KIRAN N S on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010042882026 NC: 2026:KHC:55213 CRL.A No. 108 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 108 OF 2026 (U/S 14( A ) (2)) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PREMA W/O REVANNA, AGED ABOUT 35
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 108 OF 2026 (U/S 14(A) (2))
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. PREMA
W/O REVANNA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
RESIDING AT
NADABHOGANAHALLI VILLAGE,
SHEELANERE HOBLI,
K.R. PETE TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT-571426
…APPELLANT
(BY MS. PRATHYUSHA M. S., ADV. FOR
SMT. MAITREYI KRISHNAN., ADV.)
AND:
1.
KIRAN N S
S/O SHEKARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
RESIDING AT
NADABHOGANAHALLI VILLAGE,
SHEELANERE HOBLI,
K.R. PETE TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT-571426.
2.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
K.R. PETE RURAL POLICE STATION,
MANDYA DISTRICT-571426
REPRESENTED BY THE
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R2,
R1 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED.)
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYAN N
Location: High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CRL.A FILED U/S 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT BY THE
ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT/S PRAYING THAT THIS
HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE CRL.A
AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 21.05.2025 GRANTING BAIL
TO THE RESPONDENT PASSED IN SPL.C.NO.9/2025 ON THE
FILE OF THE COURT OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, FTSC-II, MANDYA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ARGUMENTS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
In this appeal, office has raised the objections. The office objection read as under:
"The de-facto complainant has filed this appeal by challenging the bail granted Order dated 21.05.2025 passed in Spl.C.No.9/2025 by the Sessions Court.
Since the accused No.4/Respondent No.1 has already approached this Hon'ble Court in Crl.A.No.2139/2025 seeking set aside the order of bail cancellation and to restore the bail granted order in Spl.C.No.9/2025 arising out of Cr.No.235/2024 and which was allowed by the Hon'ble Justice G. Basavaraja. Hence, this appeal may not be maintainable on seeking
HC-KAR
prayer and their may be a provision to approach Hon'ble Supreme Court."
Office objections is upheld.
Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
LNN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33.2