Karnataka High Court
WP/20791/2026 of SRI. V PRASAD Vs THE COMMISSIONER on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010463082026 NC: 2026:KHC:54831 WP No. 20791 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 20791 OF 2026 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SRI. V PRASAD S/O LATE SHRI LALLAN SHARMA, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 20791 OF 2026 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
SRI. V PRASAD
S/O LATE SHRI LALLAN SHARMA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.7, PUNDARIKAKSH,
10TH B CROSS, KANAKA NAGAR,
MR RICHIES PHASE-II, NRI LAYOUT,
RAMAMURTHY NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560016.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.SANTHOSH S NAGARALE.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE COMMISSIONER
BRUHAT BENGALURU
MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP),
N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU 560002.
2.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
RAMAMURTHY DIVISION,
BBMP, NRI LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR,
BENGALURU 560016.
Digitally
signed by
VANAMALA
N
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
RAMAMURTHY DIVISION,
BBMP, NRI LAYOUT,
RAMAMURTHY NAGAR,
BENGALURU 560016.
4.
SRI. NARAYAN,
OWNER OF PROPERTY
BEARING NO.17/2, 1ST CROSS ROAD,
SMR LAYOUT, KANAKA NAGAR,
KALKERE, BENGALURU 560113.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.PAWAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; R4 SERVED)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF
THE
CONSTITUTION
OF
INDIA
PRAYING
TO
DIRECTING RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER
AND DISPOSE OF THE PETITIONER'S REPRESENTATION
DATED 29.06.2026 WITHIN A TIME FRAME TO BE
FIXED
BY
THIS
HON'BLE
COURT;B)
DIRECTING
RESPONDENTS
NO.1
TO
TO
CONDUCT
AN
IMMEDIATE
INSPECTION
OF
THE
PROPERTY
OF
RESPONDENT
NO.4,
VERIFY
THE
SANCTIONED
BUILDING PLAN, EXAMINE THE ALLEGATIONS OF
SETBACK
VIOLATION,
ENCROACHMENT
AND
UNAUTHORIZED
CONSTRUCTION
AND
INITIATE
APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE KARNATAKA
MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS ACT, 1976 AND THE
APPLICABLE BUILDING BYE-LAWS, IN ACCORDANCE
HC-KAR
WITH LAW; C) ISSUE A FURTHER DIRECTION TO
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 TO TAKE APPROPRIATE
ACTION
AGAINST
THE
ILLEGAL
CONSTRUCTION,
INCLUDING
DEMOLITION
OR
REMOVAL
OF
THE
UNAUTHORIZED PORTIONS, IF FOUND TO BE IN
VIOLATION
OF
LAW,
AFTER
FOLLOWING
DUE
PROCESS; D) DIRECT RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 TO
FURNISH A COPY OF THE INSPECTION REPORT AND
PROCEEDINGS TO THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under:
The advocate for the petitioner humbly submits as under:
1. It is humbly submitted that Petitioner had filed the above petition for seeking direction from this Hon’ble High Court to the respondent to removed or demolish the illegal construction.
HC-KAR
2. It is humbly submitted that the petitioner has instructed to his counsel withdraw the petition.
3. It is humbly submitted that the petitioner humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court may permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition. Wherefore, it is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach this Hon’ble Court in the interest of justice and equity.”
The memo is accepted and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
SA Ct:sr