Karnataka High Court

CA/35/2008 of SRI VASANTHRAO Vs MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010159752008 NC: 2026:KHC:54968 CA No. 35 of 2008 In COP No.37 of 2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2008 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.37 OF 2003 BETWEEN: SRI.

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M

COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2008

IN

COMPANY PETITION NO.37 OF 2003

BETWEEN:

SRI. VASANTHRAO,

S/O. SRI. NARAYAN RAO HULI,

75 YEARS, PENSIONER,

SRI. KAMALAGIRI BUILDING,

6TH CROSS, MALAMADDI,

DHARWAD DISTRICT,

DHARWAD.

…APPLICANT

(BY SRI. V.PADMANABHA KEDILAYA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

AND:

MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LTD.,

HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT

SYNDICATE HOUSE, UPENDRANAGAR,

MANIPAL - 576 119.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. G.KRISHNAMURTHY, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR

SRI. ASHOK G.V., ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by

PREMCHANDRA M R

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER RULE 9

UNDER COMPANY COURT RULES, 1959 READ WITH SECTION

151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Sri.G.Krishnamurthy., Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri.Ashok G.V., for the respondent appeared in person.

There is no representation on behalf of counsel for applicant.

CA No.35/2008 is filed seeking certain reliefs.

Senior Counsel Sri.Krishnamurthy., on instructions submits that the amount has been paid fully and the applicant has signed the discharge receipt.

HC-KAR

Taking note of the submission that the amount has been paid and the signing of the discharge receipt, the application in CA No.35/2008 is dismissed.

SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE

CH List No.:1 Sl No.:12

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead