Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/13980/2026 of SRI.PRIYANK.M.KHARGE Vs SRI.TEJAS.A on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010619152026 NC: 2026:KHC:54869 CRL.P No. 13980 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13980 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI.PRIYANK.M.KHARGE AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13980 OF 2026

BETWEEN:

SRI.PRIYANK.M.KHARGE

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

S/O.MALLIKARJUN M KHARGE

NO.289, 17TH CROSS ROAD,

SADASHIVNAGAR, ARAMANE NAGAR,

BENGALURU- 560080.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SANDESH J CHOUTA., SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR

SRI. PARITOSH S M, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI.TEJAS.A

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

S/O.APPAJI,

NO.288, 2ND B MAIN,

VENKATREDDY NAGAR,

JAYANAGAR, 1ST BLOCK,

JAYANAGAR 4TH BLOCK,

BENGALURU- 560011.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. DALWAI P VENKATESH., ADVOCATE)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482(FILED U/S.528 BNSS)

CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING

THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH

HC-KAR

THE

IMPUGNED

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

DATED 27.06.2026 IN PCR.NO.18986/2025 AT (ANNEXURE A) AND ALL SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS THERETO INCLUDING C.C.NO.39022/2026 AT (ANNEXURE B) PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE (XLII) 42nd ADDL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, (SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL OF CASES AGAINST SITTING AS WELL AS FORMER MPs/MLAs TRIABLE BY MAGISTRATE IN THE STATE OF KARNATAKA) AT BENGALURU.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

ORAL ORDER

Heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/complainant.

2. The order which is assailed before this Court is the order taking cognizance by the jurisdictional JMFC for the offence punishable under Section 356 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The Court is of the view that the petitioner has an equally efficacious remedy of a Criminal Revision Petition.

4. Under these circumstances, without entering into the merits of the case, the Criminal Petition is disposed of,

HC-KAR

reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order before the jurisdictional Sessions Court.

5. The time spent in prosecuting this petition from 01.09.2026 till date has to be excluded while computing limitation.

6. Registry to the documents to the petitioner after retaining the xerox copies.

(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE

GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead