Karnataka High Court
WP/16074/2026 of SRI. A. GANGAPPA Vs SMT. RANGAMMA on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010346122026 NC: 2026:KHC:54956 WP No. 16074 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 16074 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. A . GANGAPPA S/O. SRI. AVULAPPA AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION NO. 16074 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. A. GANGAPPA
S/O. SRI. AVULAPPA
K.G.F. TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 116.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA A.C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. RANGAMMA
W/O. LATE. NARAYANAPPA
K.G.F. TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT 563 116.
Digitally signed
by VINUTHA B
S
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
PERMANENT R/AT NO. 130
SOMESHWARA COLONY BTM LAYOUT,
BOMMANAHALLI, BENGALURU 560 068.
2.
SRI. VENKATARAMAPPA
S/O. SRI RAMAPPA
K.G.F. TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 116.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JUSHNU C. NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION
OF
INDIA
PRAYING
TO-QUASHING
THE
IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED VACATION
DISTRICT JUDGE AT KOLAR, DATED 11.05.2026 IN O.S. NO.
1/2026 IN I.A.NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE A, TO MEET THE ENDS
OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC,.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The Office has raised an objection as to the maintainability of the present petition in view of the provisions of Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
2. In view of the Office note, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedy as may be available to them in accordance with law.
3. If request is made to return certified copies, the Registry shall consider the same.
Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 88