Karnataka High Court
RP/230/2026 of SRI SHREYAS M BURJI Vs SRI K M MUKUNDA on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010291712026 NC: 2026:KHC:54613 RP No. 230 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS REVIEW PETITION NO. 230 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI SHREYAS M BURJI SON OF SRI. MRITYUNJAYA B. BURJI, AGED ABOUT 41
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
REVIEW PETITION NO. 230 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SRI SHREYAS M BURJI
SON OF SRI. MRITYUNJAYA B. BURJI,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.852,
“CHANNABASAVA”, 12TH MAIN,
VINAYAKA LAYOUT,
NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU-560 072.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KRISHNA MURTHY V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI K.M. MUKUNDA
SON OF LATE MUNIGANGAIAH,
AGED ABUT 46 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KENCHANAPURA,
DODDABELE POST, TYAMAGONDALU,
NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 123.
2.
SRI. MOHAN. N
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
SON OF LATE NARASIMHAMURTHY,
RESIDING AT KENCHANAPURA,
DODDABELE POST, TYAMAGONDALU,
NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 123.
Digitally signed by
JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
VIDHANASOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560001.
4.
TAHSILDHAR,
NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562123.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114
R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW
THE ORDER DATED 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 PASSED IN
WRIT PETITION NO.575 OF 2026 (KLR-RES), PASSED BY THIS
HON’BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE REVIEW
PETITION IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the review petitioner has filed a memo dated 01.10.2026 stating that the petitioner does not press the review petition and therefore the review petition may be dismissed as not pressed.
2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
HC-KAR
3. Accordingly, the review petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY CT:SM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33