Karnataka High Court
CA/641/2009 of VASANT RAO N HULI Vs MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LTD on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010608822009 NC: 2026:KHC:54971 CA No. 641 of 2009 In COP No.37 of 2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 641 OF 2009 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.37 OF 2003 BETWEEN: VASANT
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010608822009
NC: 2026:KHC:54971
CA No. 641 of 2009
In COP No.37 of 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 641 OF 2009
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.37 OF 2003
BETWEEN:
VASANT RAO N. HULI
AGED 76 YEARS,
S/O NARAYANA HULI,
MALLAMADDI, DHARWAD.
…APPLICANT
(BY SRI. V.PADMANABHA KEDILAYA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LTD.,
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
SYNDICATE HOUSE, UPENDRANAGAR,
MANIPAL - 576 119.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. G.KRISHNAMURTHY, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. ASHOK G.V., ADVOCATE)
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 9 OF COMPANIES
ACT, 1956.
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by
PREMCHANDRA M R
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010608822009
NC: 2026:KHC:54971
CA No. 641 of 2009
In COP No.37 of 2003
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Sri.G.Krishnamurthy., Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri.Ashok G.V., for the respondent appeared in person.
There is no representation on behalf of counsel for the applicant.
CA No.641/2009 is filed seeking certain reliefs.
Senior Counsel Sri.Krishnamurthy., on instructions submits that the amount has been paid fully and the applicant has signed the discharge receipt.
Taking note of the submission that the amount has been paid and the signing of the discharge receipt, the application in CA No.641/2009 is dismissed.
SD/- (JYOTI M)
JUDGE
CH List No.:1 Sl No.: 12