Karnataka High Court
CA/436/2010 of SMT. JAYAMMA Vs MAHARASTRA APEX CORPORATION LTD on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010407912010 NC: 2026:KHC:54976 CA No. 436 of 2010 In COP No.37 of 2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 436 OF 2010 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.37 OF 2003 BETWEEN: SMT.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 436 OF 2010
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.37 OF 2003
BETWEEN:
SMT. JAYAMMA
W/O. LATE SRI. N.K.SHASTRY,
655, 19TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN,
VIDYARANYAPURAM, MYSORE.
…APPLICANT
(BY SRI. V.PADMANABHA KEDILAYA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LTD.,
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
SYNDICATE HOUSE, UPENDRANAGAR,
MANIPAL - 576 119.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. G.KRISHNAMURTHY, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. ASHOK G.V., ADVOCATE)
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER RULE 9
UNDER COMPANY COURT RULES, 1959 READ WITH SECTION
151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
Digitally signed by
PREMCHANDRA M R
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Sri.G.Krishnamurthy., Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri.Ashok G.V., for the respondent appeared in person.
There is no representation on behalf of counsel for the applicant.
2. The application is flied seeking certain reliefs.
3. Senior Counsel Sri.Krishnamurthy., on instructions submits that the entire amount has been paid. Hence, nothing survive for consideration. He also argued that, this Court vide order dated 08.08.2018 had directed the applicant to come with a memo, if they have any claims in the matter. As of today, no claims are made out. Senior Counsel therefore, submits that the amount has been fully paid. Hence, the application may be dismissed, as the amount is paid.
HC-KAR
The submission is placed on record.
4. As the amount is fully paid and the claimant has not come up with any claim as of today, the application is dismissed.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
CH List No.:1 Sl No.:12