Karnataka High Court
RFA/469/2012 of L MUNISWAMY Vs N INDRA KUMAR on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010174202012 NC: 2026:KHC:55038 RFA No. 469 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 469 OF 2012 BETWEEN: L MUNISWAMY S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 469 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
L MUNISWAMY
S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
R/O NO.368, RAJIV GANDHI ROAD,
K R PURAM, EXTENSION,
BENGALURU-560036
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. T M VENKATA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
N INDRA KUMAR
S/O YALE NANJAPPA
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
1(A)
SMT. UMA INDRA KUMAR,
W/O. LATE N.INDRA KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
1(B)
MEGHANA INDRA KUMAR,
D/O. LATE N.INDRA KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
NO.686/3, 6TH A CROSS,
OPP. BWSSB WATER TANK,
DODDA BANASAWADI,
BENGALURU-5600043.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. CHANDAN S. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1(A AND B))
Digitally signed by
PREMCHANDRA M R
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Sri.T.M.Venkata Reddy, counsel for the appellant and Sri.Chandan S.Rao, counsel for respondent No.1 (A & B) appeared in person.
Sri.L.Muniswamy - appellant and respondent No.1(A) - Smt.Uma Indra Kumar, respondent No.1(B) - Smt.Meghana Indra Kumar are physically present before this Court and they have been duly identified by their respective counsel.
Counsel appearing for the respective parties jointly submit that the parties to the lis have settled the matter before the Mediation Centre and accordingly, a memorandum of settlement is drawn and the same may be taken on record and the settlement may be accepted
HC-KAR
and the appeal may be disposed of in terms of the settlement.
When queried, the parties have stated that they have indeed settled the dispute and they have arrived at compromise/ settlement and the appeal may be disposed of in terms of the compromise/ settlement arrived by them. They further state that they have arrived at settlement on their own will and volition without there being any coercion and undue influence from any side. The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties and the compromise petition is placed on record. I have perused the same with utmost care.
Taking note of the submission made by the respective parties, the memorandum of settlement entered between the parties before the KMC is placed on record and it is accepted and the appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement.
HC-KAR
The Registry concerned is hereby directed to draw the decree in terms of the compromise petition.
As the matter is settled, the Registry concerned is hereby directed to refund the requisite Court fee to the appellant as per the Karnataka Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act. Because of disposal of the appeal, interim order if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 31