Karnataka High Court
WP/3593/2024 of SRIDHAR Vs STATE BY CHAMRAJNAGAR TOWN P .S. on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010058852024 NC: 2026:KHC:54772 WP No. 3593 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 3593 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRIDHAR S/O. LATE MANCHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
WRIT PETITION NO. 3593 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRIDHAR
S/O. LATE MANCHEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
WORKING AS SUPERVISOR
T V S MOTOR COMPANY
APPACHI ENGINE DEPARTMENT
BYATHAHALLI, KADAKOLA POST
MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 311
2.
ASHWINI V R
D/O. RAVI
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
WORKING AS SUPERVISOR
T V S MOTOR COMPANY
SCOOTY PEP ENGINE DEPARTMENT
BYATHAHALLI, KADAKOLA POST
MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 311
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KUMARA L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE BY CHAMRAJNAGAR TOWN P .S.
REP BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT COMPLEX
BENGALURU - 560 001.
Digitally signed
by
ANNAPURNA G
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
SANGEETHA R.
W/O. SRIDHAR
D/O. RAJU D.
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT NO.11/182
PARVATHI NILAYA
1ST CROSS, DEVANGA BEEDHI,
CHAMARAJANAGAR CITY
CHAMARAJANAGAR.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M., HCGP)
THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS NO. 1 AND 2 IN
RESPECT OF CRIME NO.134/23 (P.C.R NO. 12/23 ON THE FILE
OF
ADDL
SENIOR
CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
JMFC
AT
CHAMARAJANAGARA)
REGISTERED
BY
THE
RESPONDENT
POLICE I.E. CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN POLICE STATION, CHAMARAJANAGARA, FOR
THE
ALLEGED
OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE
UNDER
SECTIONS
494,495,420
AND
R/W
SECTION 34 OF IPC, VIDE ANNEXURE-B DATED 19.10.2023.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. None appears for the petitioners.
HC-KAR
2. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation on the petitioner on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Writ Petition is of the year 2024, yet to be admitted.
4. Order Sheet discloses that petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting the matter.
5. In the interest of justice, this Court granted time on the last date of hearing, on payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- to the Karnataka State High Court Legal Services Committee. Same is not paid.
6. Hence, writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23