Karnataka High Court
WP/4963/2024 of M/S AMTECO BUILDING MATERIALS INDIA PVT LTD., Vs THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010103402024 NC: 2026:KHC:54805 WP No. 4963 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 4963 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S AMTECO BUILDING MATERIALS INDIA PVT. LTD.,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010103402024
NC: 2026:KHC:54805
WP No. 4963 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
WRIT PETITION NO. 4963 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S AMTECO BUILDING
MATERIALS INDIA PVT. LTD.,
NO.75/1, 1ST MAIN ROAD
A COMPANY INCORPORATED
UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT
R.K. HEGDE NAGAR MAIN ROAD
OPP SHOBHA CITY, NOORNAGAR
KATTIGENAHALLI, CHOKKANAHALLI
YELAHANKA, BENGALURU – 560 064
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
MRS. HASEENA BEGUM.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI M. MOHAMED IBRAHIM, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER
AND CHIEF MANGAER
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
CIRCLE OFFICE: SASTRA DEPARTMENT
NO.26-27, RAHEJA TOWERS
M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDERS PASSED ON 10/08/2023 ON THE PETITION UNDER
SECTION 14 OF SARFAESI ACT BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, TUMAKURU IN CRL.MISC.NO.153/2023
WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A.
Digitally signed
by PAVITHRA B
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010103402024
NC: 2026:KHC:54805
WP No. 4963 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner so also the respondent submits in unison that the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent - Bank has been settled, therefore, prayer sought in the writ petition does not survive for further consideration.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (T.P.VIVEKANANDA) JUDGE
GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27