Karnataka High Court
WP/11176/2024 of MOHAMMED SUHAIL Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 1 October 2026
CNR: KAHC010223292024 NC: 2026:KHC:54678 WP No. 11176 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 11176 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: MOHAMMED SUHAIL S/O MAKBUL AHMED AGED ABOUT 21
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
WRIT PETITION NO. 11176 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
MOHAMMED SUHAIL
S/O MAKBUL AHMED
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
OCC: COOLIE
R/AT MUM NO.1100,
BEACH ROAD,
KASABA BENGRE,
MANGALORE - 575 001.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. DINESHKUMAR RAO K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOME,
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SPECIAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE
AND DCP (LAW AND ORDER)
MANGALORE - 575 001.
Digitally signed
by PAVITHRA B
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
THE POLICE INSPECTOR
OF PANAMBUR POLICE STATION,
MANGALURU CITY,
MANGALURU - 575 001.
(RESPONDENTS ARE REPRESENTED
BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS
BENGALURU - 560 001)
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. SRINIVAS KUMAR, HCGP)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
IMPUGNED ORDER OF EXTERNMENT DTD 20.03.24 PASSED BY
R2 IN NO. 47/NEM/KPA/MC/2024 AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND
ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo stating that the prayer sought in the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
HC-KAR
2. Taking the memo on record, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (T.P.VIVEKANANDA) JUDGE
JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39